Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)B
Posts
0
Comments
83
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • No lol

    The job is producing usable work

    The interview is getting the opportunity to get paid for producing usable work.

  • Not making it through the interviews doesn't indicate job success, it indicates job attainment. I'm saying job success is less related to listed qualifications than you might think.

  • "qualified" is a loaded term. Industry or product knowledge go a long way to succeed in quite a few businesses.

    As an example "Unqualified" for sales might just mean the applicant doesn't have an MBA or whatever other degree, even though they have dealt with break fix service and other solution oriented work.

    Similarly, if a sales rep went into installation or project management they would have a leg up.

  • Yeah shit happened like a guy lifting liquor got tackled and got bottle glass pushed into his torso and employees got hurt and or killed in other incidents, shoppers got harassed and confined, all these people sued and now if you want to arrest some guy, get trained for it and do it properly.

  • It seems like you need a surrogate imagination at this point. Good luck.

  • Man I don't know, why don't you go ask this hypothetical man in this hypothetical society? Don't be a dick if you expect to be welcomed.

  • Yeah

    Just like in the existing capitalist economy, case managers decide who receives disability payments and insurance analysts decide who gets medical treatment. Who knew society means being at the whims of other people 🤡

    Is a social economy, you can directly appeal to people with resources you want, as in "socialize".

  • He doesn't have to.

  • Maybe if you want to piss off the farmer....

    You are forgetting that there is a component of anonymity that fiat currency provides transactions. You lose that in a social economy.

    Money is "asocial".

  • You don't want the librarian to starve, or the blacksmith.

  • They like it and it does something they like, or their old one wore out and it's the most interesting one available.

    Is needing a new thing because your old one wore out, "being a dumbass"?

    Really you need some help for your depression if you can't imagine other people being happy with something.

  • The Wright brothers were fairly wealthy business owners before kittyhawk. You don't know what you are talking about re: "innovation motivators"

  • Ok man. The use of money does indeed enable you to be a loner misanthrope that is ambivalent about your reputation.

    Other "social" systems rely on being "social"

  • If you don't value the thing for it's intended function why are you bothering to take one?

    Also, if you destroy or misplace the thing, there's no reason to give you different things. If you want another thing, you are going to be made to work for it.

    There's always a bellows that needs pumping.

  • Don't need no oversight - ZUCKERBOT 3000!!!Don't need no filtering - ZUCKERBOT 3000!!!!Don't need no moderation - ZUCKERBOT!!! ZUCKERBOT!!! THREE THOUSAND!!!

    Verse needs no edits

  • Are you making a Revolting Cocks reference

  • Recurring shrink isn't going to be claimable. These customers are walking out with an extra case of Snapple not a TV.

  • It's 1g, you could do laparoscopic biopsy to get that amount of liver, and you wouldn't expose the bear to trace cocaine and hair loss supplements