Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
3
Comments
288
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Right. I see there's no logical discussion to be had here. Have a good day.

  • My question was very simple and limited in scope:

    Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?

    I did not make any sweeping comments, and I would appreciate if you stopped trying to claim things on my behalf.

  • Fuck knows. It's not like I made any such claim, you just decided to put up a strawman argument.

  • Since when could someone do this ... with a couple of clicks and zero training, for free and on any device?

    You know, somebody probably said the exact same thing about Photoshop when it first came out? Back when cutting up photos and pasting them together was a thing. Then again, somebody probably said the same thing about the advent of photography too, during the days of woodcuts and oil paintings.

  • Would the impact have been any different if they had used photoshop?

  • Or just lazy bureaucrats using each other as justification for the selected criteria. Hard to tell the difference between laziness and conspiracy

  • That's just a bad implementation, then. Tax brackets are progressive for a reason, having a cliff like that should be an obvious no no.

    Not to say you don't have a point, because you do, but the govt could fix that particular issue very easily.

  • Props for having an open mind!

  • That's easy for you to say when you're not the one headed to jail

  • She wasn't placed in solitary for breaking the rule, that's a fairly common rule to break. She was placed in solitary for resisting the transfer.

  • ... fair point.

  • What are they gonna do that they're not already trying to do? Revolt? Subvert the rule of law? Shoot up some schools?

  • While I have my own issues with OP, would you explain how he is breaking the rules with his posts?

  • Well, let them? The people who would take it seriously and get worked up about it are the ones who are in support of this stupid law in the first place.

  • Are we then supposed to lower the standard of all writing to the lowest common denominator, then? I get your point, but I'm not sure the solution is to move to grade school levels of communication.

  • Dude, it's tongue in cheek. It's meant to be funny. Even if you don't find it so, it very obviously wasn't meant to be taken seriously

  • Guessing you didn't read the article, since they elaborated more about the Satanic temple further down?

  • I’m a bit baffled by why anyone would give them money though, since even if you were guilty of a crime in China, the UK doesn’t extradite people to China

    Childhood indoctrination to obey the authorities, plus awareness that if China wants you back, they probably won't use the official extradition process. See the recent examples: