It is interesting that you ask for sources and logic while relying heavily on a false equivalence. Using the specific geopolitical instability and porous borders of West Africa as a proxy for US immigration policy is a classic strawman. The administrative and security infrastructure of the US is not comparable to a region where groups like Boko Haram operate across vast, ungoverned territories, and suggesting the two situations are "objective" mirrors of one another ignores the vastly different historical and logistical realities at play.
If we are going to apply actual logic to the concept of "harm to the country," we have to look at the data regarding who truly threatens American safety. Historically, the most devastating attacks on US soil were carried out by individuals who entered the country legally, such as the 9/11 hijackers. Furthermore, the most pressing threats to domestic stability in recent years have come from within, including the January 6th insurrection and the violence seen in the streets of Minneapolis. Even the most prolific human trafficking and abuse networks, such as the Epstein case, operated entirely within the legal and elite structures of the country rather than through people walking through the bush. This suggests that "knowing who comes and goes" is a superficial fix for a much deeper, often homegrown, security issue.
Finally, it is logically inconsistent to discuss a migration crisis without acknowledging the role the US plays in creating the "push factors" that drive it. The instability in the nations these immigrants are fleeing is frequently a direct byproduct of American drug consumption, which fuels the cartels, and decades of US meddling in the governments of the Western Hemisphere. From the 1954 Guatemalan coup to the long history of the School of the Americas, the US has often been the primary architect of the chaos it now attempts to border itself against. If you want to talk about objective problems, you have to start with the fact that these people are at the doorstep of the very nation that destabilized their own.
He also advocates for comprehensive immigration reform, probably because it wasn't cool closing the door you and your ancestors used to get in.
It would also be like, legit the best if the US stopped fucking around with other nations, at the least the ones in latin America where most undocumented immigrants come from.... likely because of the lack of stable governments over the last century has made those places difficult to live in.
Probably not only because these projects will take years to be built and will hopefully take less type to prevent the inevitable. Don't worry about why I'm packing up and looking at flights out of the country though.
They have always voted for this, Trump is not even the first one. It boggles the mind how many immigrants were pro Trump, I'm an immigrant and I had to listen to these shit stains argue against their own best interest, my reply was always why haven't they self deported yet.
Enjoy it man, that's a privilege to have and it only takes 1 bad incident for it all to come crumbling down when the media blows it out of proportion and everyone goes on a witch hunt for minorities.
Man if my wife didn't push us to buy in 21, we would be way more than 3 years away, I wouldn't be able to afford my house today. Now as much as it feels like a blessing to own a house, it's also a trap since if I sell, I can't get another one.
Let's tell them they're next