Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A
Posts
4
Comments
1362
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • You either get a driver's license or a state ID (which may be compliant with Real ID if it's compliant). You generally can't have both in any of the 10 states I've lived in.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I have been waiting over a year to get a passport. They're so backed up that they literally just send you your documents back and ask you to reapply in a given amount of time. It's also more expensive to get a passport than it is to get a driver's license or "real ID" and you may not have the option to just not have one if you work somewhere that requires it (like an airport).

    If your concern is that they might change the rules about being allowed to use Real ID for voting (or that having a Real ID would be a requirement for voting, excluding non-Real ID licenses or state ID's because the government could potentially invalidate the ID you do have, I'm going to point out that in this time where ICE is literally stealing people off the street regardless of their legal status in the country and deporting them, what you're suggesting doesn't make sense especially with the higher bar of entry for a passport, and the fact that some states do not any longer provide any other option besides passport or REAL ID.

  • Yeah. GROK and Twitter have entered the chat. Seriously though, we've regressed pretty far in what the general public deems acceptable.

  • I feel like this is one of those situations where you might be able to use something like an NFC tag to force your phone into a locked state where it would require the pin to unlock.

    I think an SOS style pin input is great in theory but I don't know that most people will use it because it's not necessarily going to help in places where you might be required or forced to give up biometric unlocking credentials (some countries make it so there is not a legal way to refuse to give up your fingerprint or face scan etc). This isn't any easier than setting a lockdown key combination etc. Currently on my phone the lockdown is set to enable if I press the power button and volume up key at the same time and I think it's similarly easy to do on iphones.

    I feel like this is one of those situations where it also might be a workable idea to use something like an NFC tag to force your phone into a locked state where it would require the pin to unlock. If of course lockdown mode can't be enabled on your device using a key combo and you have NFC available.

  • Technically, the other fob shouldn't be affected if it works the way I think it does. There's usually a maximum number of keys synced to the vehicle.

    This attack basically forces the key fob the flipper zero is substituting itself for to fall out of sync because the flipper zero doesn't transmit the rollover response from the vehicle back to the key fob. So the F0 sends the rolling code it intercepted from the key fob to the vehicle. Vehicle is like, yep, that's matches, and then it does it's rollover and sends out the rollover response. The response doesn't get back to the key because of range etc and then the key remains a step behind the vehicle in the rollover sequence from then on out.

    Technically I think they the key could potentially be resynced to the car. (My understanding is that a key of the correct type could be synced to any car that it can be programmed for so long as the key isn't physically damaged, and the security module isn't compromised with malicious code that would prevent it).

  • Literally just saw the top guy in a comments section on a post about how Anthropic and the rest are being sued for copyright infringement. Funny.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I feel like porn websites have money and lots of reasons to want to burn Florida.

  • I read a comment recently explaining that a child's nervous system cannot differentiate between pain or threat of pain inflicted due to discipline or pain or threat of pain inflicted due to abuse and honestly that changed something in my head. Like. It doesn't matter if the kid knows they have done something wrong and understands that there's a punishment as a result. The nervous system cannot tell the difference.

  • I like you.

  • Yeah. That makes it splash resistant, not water and grime proof. I have a pair of bone conduction headphones I wear at work with that flap and I still have to use contact cleaner on that port like at least once every couple of weeks.

  • I can't imagine how filthy the port would get on mine. Industrial work places and open ports are notconductive conducive to the healthy life of electronics.

  • I mean. I tell HA "To play that song I like" and it plays "Lone Digger" by Caravan Palace. Back in the olden days of Google Home I had a routine called "shut up" that would turn off the mic if I told it to (if a show or audio playing mentioned "hey google".

  • Some cars brake for you as soon as they think you're going to crash (if you have your foot on the accelerator, or even on the brake if the car doesn't believe you'll be able to stop in time). Fords especially will do this, usually in relation to adaptive cruise control, and reverse brake assist. You can turn that setting off, I believe but it is meant to prevent a crash, or collision. In fact, Ford's Bluecruise assisted driving feature was phantom braking to the point there was a recall about it because it was braking with nothing obstructing the road. I believe they also just updated it so that the accelerator press will override the bluecruise without disengaging it in like the 1.5 update which happened this year.

    But I was thinking you were correcting me about autopilot for planes and I was confused.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQJL3htsDyQ

  • Part of the reason that air travel is as safe as it is is because governments held both airlines and manufacturers accountable for planes crashes or other air travel incidents, especially those leading to death or expensive property damage/mishap. You have to have significant training and flight hours to be a commercial pilot.

    In the cases where Boeing has been found (through significant investigation) to be liable for death or injury, they have been held accountable. That's literally why the 800 maxes were grounded world wide. Literally why they were forced to add further safety measures after the door plug failure which was due to their negligence as a manufacturer.

    https://apnews.com/article/boeing-ntsb-door-plug-737-alaska-airlines-721493c5e64081145aab21f2cf3fabcd

    https://thereader.mitpress.mit.edu/what-boeings-door-plug-debacle-says-about-the-future-of-aviation-safety/

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX_groundings

    https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/boeing-charged-737-max-fraud-conspiracy-and-agrees-pay-over-25-billion

  • I'm not sure what you're correcting. The autopilot feature has adaptive cruise control and lane keeping assist, and auto steering.

    Adaptive cruise control will brake to maintain a distance with the vehicle in front of it but maintain the set speed otherwise, lane keeping assist will keep the vehicle in it's lane/prevent it from drifting from its lane, and combined with auto steering will keep it centered in the lane.

    I specifically explained that a planes auto pilot does those things (maintain speed, altitude, and heading), and that people don't know that this is all it does. It doesn't by itself avoid obstacles or account for weather etc. It'd fly right into another plane if it was occupying that airspace. It won't react to weather events like windsheer (which could cause the plane to lose altitude extremely quickly), or a hurricane. If there's an engine problem and an engine loses power? It won't attempt to restart. It doesn't brake. It can't land a plane.

    But Musk made some claims that Teslas autopilot would drive the vehicle for you without human interference. And people assume that autopilot (in the pop culture sense) does a lot more than it actually does. This is what I'm trying to point out.

  • I agree. I hate auto braking features. I'm not a fan of cruise control. I very much dislike adaptable cruise control, lane keeping assist, reverse braking, driving assist, and one pedal mode. I drive a stick shift car from the early 2000's for this reason. Just enough tech to be useful. Not enough tech to get in the way of me being in control of the car.

    But there's definitely some cruise controls out there even before all the stuff with sensors and such hit the market that doesn't work the way lots of people in this thread seem to think. Braking absolutely will cancel the set cruise control but doesn't turn it off. Accelerating in some cars also doesn't cancel the cruise control, it allows you to override it to accelerate but will go back to the set cruise control speed when you take your foot off the accelerator.

    I absolutely recognize that not being able to override the controls has a significant potential to be deadly. All I'm saying is there's lots of drivers who probably shouldn't be on the road who these tools are designed for and they don't understand even the basics of how they work. They think the stuff is a cool gimmick. It makes them overconfident. And when you couple that with the outright lies that Musk has spewed continuously about these products and features, you should be able to see just why Tesla should be held accountable when the public trusts the company's claims and people die or get seriously injured as a result.

    I've driven a lot of vehicles with features I absolutely hated. Ones that took agency away from the driver that I felt was extremely dangerous. On the other hand, I have had people just merge into me like I wasn't there. On several occasions. Happens to me at least every month or so. I've had people almost hit me from behind because they were driving distracted. I've literally watched people back into their own fences. Watched people wreck because they lost control of their vehicle or weren't paying attention. Supposedly these "features" are meant to prevent or mitigate the risks of that. And people believe they are more capable of mitigating that risk than they are, due to marketing and outright ridiculous claims from tech enthusiasts who promote these brands.

    If I know anything I know that you can't necessarily make people read the warning label. And it becomes harder to override what they believe if you lied to them first and then try to tell them the truth later.

  • The commercial web that I use that might require ID would be for payment processing etc. My bank knows how old I am. I can and will pay bills directly through my bank instead of using their portal. Or they can explain to me in writing why they don't want to take my payment. Just about everything else is optional.

  • Nope. I'm correcting you because apparently most people don't even know how their cruise control works. But feel however you feel.

  • Because it still basically does what's they said. The only new advent for the autopilot system besides maintaining speed, heading, and altitude is the ability to use and set a GPS heading, and waypoints (for the purposes of this conversation). It will absolutely still fly into a mountain if not for other collision avoidance systems. Your average 737 or A320 is not going to spontaneously change course just because of the elevation of the ground below it changed. But you can program other systems in the plane to know to avoid a specific flight path because there is a known hazard. I want you to understand that we know a mountain is there. They don't move around much in short periods of time. Cars and pedestrians are another story entirely.

    There's a reason we still have air traffic controllers and even then pilots and air traffic control aren't infallible and they have way more systems to make flying safe than the average car (yes even the average Tesla).