I'm not sure why she's being banned from criticizing the company? Like she signed a "non NDA" that included a clause about disparagement of the company, I get that, but I don't really understand how that's not a violation of her rights and therefore an invalidation of the contract.
And on further reading it's claimed that she hasn't been forced to pay any damages for breach of that contract so how is she on the verge of bankruptcy? Is it that she can't promote her book?
Because they will create their own circlejerk in the fediverse too and people will leave them alone to do it. Instances would likely defederate from a truth social instance if it were federated. They are also in the habit of banning anyone who speaks against their side so it wouldn't do much good to try.
And that was literally the Chinese government who made that call. Not even really to do with the US law change or anything. They were throwing a tantrum and it came with an added bonus of "censorship".
RAM (Radar Absorbing Material) coatings have existed for quite awhile. We use them for all kinds of stuff in the military industrial complex. The main question I have is who is doing upkeep to make sure that material/paint is intact and still maintains efficacy. And also how much is that going to cost? This isn't new tech, but it sounds like some company is trying to market it to people afraid of 5G based entirely on the commentary here.
Because science (and American Scientists) is inconvenient to him and his narrative. RFK Jr is busy running the CDC into the ground and anything that helps them do that is okay. Yes, even losing our ranking in cancer research.
All you have to understand is that Trump can't figure out a way to use cancer research to line his pockets so he doesn't want anyone to invest time and effort and money into it.
People who voted for him don't seem to have realized it yet but this administration is going to be very expensive to the American tax payer. We're going to be trying to throw money at all the problems he's causes causing for decades after this.
So, let me get this straight. Spotify uses AI, is developing AI and is allowing (and possibly seeding the platform with) AI generated music.
And the company [Spotify] is upset that the users are downloading their own data and putting in it trust in a collective for the purposes of selling it to an AI company to analyze?
And Spotify made it part of their TOS that you have the right to download your own data as a user, but also made it part of the TOS that you can't use the data you own to train AI (which only makes sense if you don't own your data).
I didn't go test it. I have never used an LLM and directly block them from my digital experience.
However I'm not surprised that people would like to verify things like this regardless of their dislike for or distrust of the tech specifically because LLM'S aren't the only things that lie on the internet.
Trust but verify is an accepted metric in lots of tech circles.
And that is why I don't click on or watch YouTube videos from here. Either I've seen the video already (as is the case with a lot of gamers nexxus vids), or I am not willing to give the amount of time it takes to watch the video when I could read a distilled version of it in a minute or so. I don't care about your greeting (hey, this is [channel] here, back with another video. Today we'll be talking about [insert topic], but first ...[mindless garbage]).
I know that newer gens love video format and want it for all the things but I do not.
Absolutely not. If you want to track them that badly then put an ankle monitor on them as part of their parole conditions.
Please note I don't agree with the ankle monitor either but at least it can't make up data about these people. If you're paroling them and they have paid their debt to society, I think it's fair to have them check in with a human parole officer at intervals and leave them alone.
He's not wrong. This is the lesson that conservatives who were happy to exact political violence against their enemies failed to understand. They can have political violence enacted against them.
It can and most likely will happen to them and they're having a surprised Pikachu face moment about it.
Off topic: As someone who just got a verbal reprimand at work for "language" due to having an outburst of irritation where an explosive expletive was used (which is a common enough occurrence in the hangar where I work), I'm seriously about to start auto censoring everything in the most gen Alpha way possible just to annoy the others.
I'm not sure why she's being banned from criticizing the company? Like she signed a "non NDA" that included a clause about disparagement of the company, I get that, but I don't really understand how that's not a violation of her rights and therefore an invalidation of the contract.
And on further reading it's claimed that she hasn't been forced to pay any damages for breach of that contract so how is she on the verge of bankruptcy? Is it that she can't promote her book?