Right? If he really thought it was forged either that would have been his allegation against WSJ or his lawyers would tell him to STFU and drop proof in front of a judge.
Waving your hands saying “maybe it’s a forgery” is pretty much admitting it’s real.
Yeah, this is weird. Does Digg need someone proselytizing for it? Just build something good and people will use it. This kind of hype is a turn-off, personally.
Guessing that either they did shady shit and pin it on the dead CEO. Or, this is a plot by the Trump admin to make it look like there’s lots of Medicare fraud so they can justify cuts.
Why do you expect anyone to offer a complete cure when none exists? People are offering known helpful actions that can lead to better outcomes. What the fuck is wrong with that?
Very few countries require consent in public and some that do, like France, make exceptions for art and other non-commercial photos.
But, we’re not talking about some commercial photographer taking photos in public. We’re talking about an NGO who wants to snap photos anytime while people are doing their work. It’s absurd to think they can stop everyone every time to get some snaps.
Trust me it’s not worth having that one or two people working with their special requirements. A blanket waiver saves tons of time and hassle.
I say this is a complete over reaction and a photo for the org is not comparable to whatever Delta is doing. You want to hide in a bunker and never show your face in public? Go for it. But, there’s more productive privacy battlefields out there than an NGO wanting to snap photos for for their marketing. Your face is going to be out there, anyway.
That’s completely unrealistic in most situations and would never take a matter of seconds. Also, it would make every photo stages. All that to cater to one person’s preferences is not reasonable.
This is just so they can take photos and video of volunteers and they don’t have to get releases from each and every person every time someone snaps a photo. Without this waiver, getting photos and video would be a pain in the ass and take up some of every volunteer’s time.
Think about it. You’re asking them to jump through extra hoops every time you’re volunteering. Now, they have to track who signed the waiver and who didn’t. They can’t have staff or volunteers just snap photos whenever they have time. Now, they have to plan every shoot. This costs time and money.
It’s probably really is better for them to just not have people volunteering who don’t want their face on a flyer or to be seen in a commercial or training video.
Depends on the reason for the return and the amount of the fee. It does cost a business money to take product back to stock. Businesses need to keep stock moving out. Just holding stock costs them money. Taking stock back costs even more. They likely can’t sell it as new on top of the normal overhead costs of stocking it.
If it’s returned because you didn’t like it, it’s reasonable for you to bear some of the cost.
If it’s defective or doesn’t work as advertised, that’s different. The retailer should eat the cost of that.
Another conclusion I come to is Steve Bannon is also a pedophile. Just based on GamerGate and, fuck it, looking at him. Protecting Trump may also be protecting himself.
Right? If he really thought it was forged either that would have been his allegation against WSJ or his lawyers would tell him to STFU and drop proof in front of a judge.
Waving your hands saying “maybe it’s a forgery” is pretty much admitting it’s real.