A lot of people reported that they did. I don't know why. Nothing in their statement said that. They did say they were going to add some "advanced workflows" but didn't elaborate anymore than that. It says it right in the link in OP:
Update: Google has not “backed down” from developer verification: Contrary to a vague mention of a possible “advanced flow” that may eventually allow “experienced users to accept the risks of installing software that isn’t verified”, Google’s description of the program continues to state plainly that: "Starting in September 2026, Android will require all apps to be registered by verified developers in order to be installed on certified Android devices". Until such time that they have shown evidence that it will be possible to bypass the verification process without undue friction, we must believe what is stated on their official page: that all apps from non-registered developers will be blocked once their lock-down goes into effect.
I'm sure that makes it real useful to have, then, since no one knows it to call you.
I meant I don't give it to companies, because I know that's why they want it.
how am I supposed to read this, then?
How about exactly how it's fucking written? Without making shit up? Do you think you can do that? Telling you how to prevent something is not the same thing as blaming you for it.
Being "in the Epstein files" is meaningless. There are literally millions of them, and thousands of people. That doesn't mean any of them are guilty of anything (even if many of them are). Do better.
They first promised production by "end of 2022". That date came and went and what we got instead was another prototype, and zero explanation of what happened. Then they changed the entire structure of the chassis from a composite material to forged carbon fiber and released like a dozen more prototypes. Then they decided the entire powertrain they were planning to use wasn't viable and completely replaced that as well, losing AWD in the process, making them FWD only. Cue more "production intent" prototypes. That's when I decided they had no intention of ever selling these. They had ample opportunities but chose instead to spend their time making fundamental design changes. They've pushed back the delivery date time and time again, without notification or explanation.
The Motorcycle Industry Council has formally opposed the bill, warning lawmakers that removing autocycles from the current motorcycle definition without creating a separate federal safety category would place them in “classification limbo,” making it illegal to sell or register them.
He's lying.