Basically no. What you're calling tailored AI is actually low cost AI. You'll be hard pressed, on the other hand, to get ChatGPT o3 to hallucinate at all
What would Altman gain from overstating the environmental impact of his own company?
You should consider the possibility that CEOs of big companies essentially always think very hard about how to talk about everything so that it always benefits them
I can see the benefits, I can try to explain if you're actually interested
But let's use the device as a tool for thought rather than an Oracle
In doing so, let's examine the counterfactual: do you think the Harris campaign likely was privy to knowledge that we are not and which isn't shared? I absolutely do
What makes this a bullshit take? Focusing attention on actual problems is a great way to make progress