Skip Navigation

帖子
2
评论
855
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Yo wtf?

    As someone in a similar-sounding situation who usually runs the code and maintainance - w t f?

    There is no way one of my buddies taking over turns anything into a nazi safe space.

    tf???

  • Yes. 🤷‍♂️

    It's not even hard core. Escape that corporate screaming.

  • ... and this is how IT ends up being responsible for a breach.

    It is a bug, unexpected and undefined behavior - it shouldnt have been there.

    You are not wrong about the outcome from a capitalist view, but otherwise you are.

  • Tesla, too!

  • You make your own decisions, though.

  • Good. Fuck fascism.

  • You are saying the fashion trend involving looking like a young girl is only coincidentally called "Lolita"?

    Gonna check out of this discussion at this point. 👋

  • Hold up. You're getting fiery while claiming "Lolita" is only a fashion trend, when it is actually a reference to that very book. You have some good points, but you need to admit that there is context here that exists, regardless of if this person wants it to or not.

  • Until they get a scratch, it gets infected, and they end up dying a slow, painful death from sepsis.

    The grass is always fucking greener.

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • ... and you're blocked.

    Amazing that this person thinks spamming is going to improve anything.

  • Our rail systems are crumbling for a reason.

    It is much better to ship by train than truck. If we put this money toward revitalizing and expanding our rail in this country it would have a way better ROI.

  • One worked, though. 🤷‍♂️

  • ... always has been.

  • This. It is easy to

    <checks notes>

    NOT put a bunch of cameras in your own house to surveil yourself.

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • 🤝

  • 已删除

    Permanently Deleted

    跳过
  • Leave that website.

    There is no fixing it.

  • ITT: people with crumbling infrastructure under a corporate oligarchy discuss why they are unhealthy.

  • I remember something regarding shady examiners, but I assumed the FAA got those people rechecked with priority since, as I recall, it affected a lot of working commercial pilots.

    I would also assume they would have offered that explanation rather than scrubbing the internet.

    I think that explanation is probably unlikely here.

  • Reading this story, knowing almost nothing about this guy, it sounds like he went and got his license just to try to put the screws to actual pilots, maybe pilots in a union?

    And then he lied about the level of licensure he obtained?

    This is classic business person shit and any pilot, it seems to me, should be fucking worried that a guy like that would be running the FAA.

    At least, that's my non-pilot layman's take. Am I way off?