Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)A

an_onanist

@ an_onanist @lemmy.world

帖子
34
评论
28
加入于
3 yr. ago

  • workflow

    跳过

  • Slaves

  • Downvoting posts that commit logical fallacies.

    跳过

  • You've assumed the OP is downvoting because of the wrongness of the argument rather than the lack of validity.

  • Downvoting posts that commit logical fallacies.

    跳过

  • Name one what? One post that commits a logical fallacy? A logical fallacy? You've been downloaded for creating a vague argument.

  • Downvoting posts that commit logical fallacies.

    跳过

  • No assumption was made on the accuracy of the argument only on the validity of the argument,therefore no fallacy was committed,. On the other hand you committed the Hasty generalization fallacy by assuming OP's intent.

  • Memes @lemmy.ml
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    Downvoting posts that commit logical fallacies.

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    They are not sending their best

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    Trump administration: But the laws make law enforcement so tedious and cumbersome

  • From your standards, are abusive people or those who cause trauma/discrimination “evil”?

    跳过

  • It is not about acknowledgement, it's about understanding the morality of the action. Most of the time, only they know the answer to that question.

  • From your standards, are abusive people or those who cause trauma/discrimination “evil”?

    跳过

  • In my opinion, in order for an action to be evil, the actor must know what is good or what is right behavior. While sometimes the actor acts with intent to cause harm, sometimes, the actor is ignorant of such things.

  • Mildly Infuriating @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    Deleting Google's cookies weekly

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    Republicans: it makes sense if you don't think about it

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    If Trump says the spending is wasteful, it must be

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    Is now a good time to revisit some of Trump's promises?

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    Do as I say, not as I do

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    Trump loves secrecy

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    No surprise, some of the Venezuelan 'gang members,' have no gang affiliation

  • Political Humor @lemmy.world
    an_onanist @lemmy.world

    If only

  • A reminder how we got here

    跳过

  • It wasn't the Democratic voters that were the issue, they were never going to vote for Trump. Worst case scenario, they stay home. It was the independents and left-leaning Republicans that needed to be converted. There are a lot more of them, and they were frustrated by the southern border, the culture was and inflation.

  • Sure all primitive societies create a supernatural belief system, but mine is true.

    跳过

  • Except that theory has been proven effective and theology is guesswork of desert peasants.

  • Sure all primitive societies create a supernatural belief system, but mine is true.

    跳过

  • Scientific laws allow for probabilistic predictability.

  • Sure all primitive societies create a supernatural belief system, but mine is true.

    跳过

  • It depends on your definitions. Religion puts nonexistent intentionality into the system by adding a diety. Science explains the existing system using the language of mathematics.

  • Gonna be as rad as possible till the day I die.

    跳过

  • If that guy is in his 40's he has lived a hard life. I'm surprised he is still conscious let alone mobile.

  • So close

    跳过

  • My experience with libreoffice is that the word suggestions come from my usage.

  • How do you differentiate between knowledge and belief?

    跳过

  • No I'm not. I am not interested in academic study. I am interested in real world application. I am aware of justified true belief and that most people don't apply it. My curiosity is in how people acnually think about the concept.

  • How do you differentiate between knowledge and belief?

    跳过

  • That is like the home owner's application of the scientific method: test the hypothesis until you decide it is a pretty solid system

  • How do you differentiate between knowledge and belief?

    跳过

  • Your description makes belief sound like willful ignorance.

    It sounds like the real challenge is knowing when you have enough information to convert your educated guess into full-blown knowledge

  • How do you differentiate between knowledge and belief?

    跳过

  • What about the ideas that can be neither confirmed nor denied like the existence of extraterrestrial life or a machine of 100% efficiency?

  • How do you differentiate between knowledge and belief?

    跳过

  • What if you should have some doubt (belief) but due to ignorance or hubris do not and so you elevate a concept to 'knowledge' that should not rightfully be there? I'm not trying to be argumentative, I'm genuinely curious about that gray area of misplaced confidence.

  • How do you differentiate between knowledge and belief?

    跳过

  • So, if we haven't studied the underlying axioms or foundation of a conclusion, we cannot have knowledge of it? That seems to imply the only things we have knowledge of are the things we have invested significant time and energy into. It's that correct?

  • How do you differentiate between knowledge and belief?

    跳过

  • If so much is contextual, is there no knowledge based on truth or fact?