Which is more of a "zero-tolerance" policy, like unto giving the same punishment to a student defending themselves as the one given to the person who initiated the attack.
That's about the right amount of words to completely ignore the sentiment of a statement so you can make a vapid holier-than-thou statement based on purported moral superiority.
Because corporations aren't going to change because of an internet opinion piece. They'll only change if they're forced.
The problem is the only ones with the power to force them are the government... and the only one who can force the government is the people.
The problem isn't that we're telling individuals to do their part instead of corporations... the problem is that we're telling individuals to attack the problem as individuals instead of working together. The problem is that we're telling people to aim in the wrong direction.
And worst of all, we're telling people "It's someone else's fault, they should be the one's dealing with it" and then sitting on our hands.
A literal onion.