I don't think so. The main reason Facebook is so bad is it's engagement algorithm. It is designed to maximize user engagement to sell adds, and it does that by putting outrage inspiring posts in front of users so that they have an emotional response and stay engaged. Using a human voting system instead of an outrage algorithm to determine what content people is exactly why I enjoy this platform over the other social media platforms.
Is there still rage bait here? Of course! Is it systematically shoved down your throat? No.
I was assuming you'd make an account with the ID for the govt instance and use anonymous accounts for all other browsing. At least that's what I would do.
I believe there is existing precedent from SCOTUS that official government Twitter accounts were not allowed to block citizens accounts due to it being a 'public square'. So that was a govt official taking the action of silencing someone's ability to respond to them on social media protected by 1A. If the PLATFORM had blocked that user it would have been perfectly valid, since the GOVT did not silence a citizen's speech.
I believe having the govt run the instance would make the entire forum subject to 1A in a way current social media is not. Would love a constitutional scholar to chime in, but that's my argument.
I also don't get the impression there is a large bot presence here today. I do think if the platform was used as a normal communication network between constituient and representative it would probably become a target for foreign and domestic bots.
Its been speculated that was probably done intentionally (making removing the detailed copy easy to remove but the adhesive hard to remove) knowing the standard response would be to take it down.
It would fit the more performative art style that they're known for.
I think the most reliable way to advance a scientific field is to find a technique used in a different field and apply it to yours. Even more reliable if you use techniques from theoretical math.
It's so weird thinking about how we're just copying DNA. That's pretty much the purpose of life; replicate these strange molecules as much as possible. Consciousness is some unintended byproduct of the 'copy forever' algorithm.
This is why lectures should be obsolete at this point. Lectures should be a video done really well once. Class should be practice time where you can ask experts for help when you get stuck.
I think it's a casual argument. People are saying pitbulls are not inherently more violent, they just tend to be the dog of choice for people who want violent (guard) dogs. They are then taught violent behaviors by their owners.
Technically that is profit maximizing, where as profit is just surplus value created. Nothing wrong with profit, profit maximizing at the expense of all else is a recipe for civilization collapse.
In our tree mushroom example, if both organisms grow faster by sharing nutrients than by hoarding, they have both made a profit.
Bay leaves add nothing: change my mind.
I even made bay leaf tea one time to isolate the flavor; nothing. Bay leaves are a hoax.