Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)X

Xanza

@ Xanza @lemm.ee

Posts
1
Comments
1078
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • Republicans target two judges for impeachment

    Jump

  • They have the votes. There's really no reason to suspect it won't happen.....

    This is a very dangerous and scary time.

  • Tulsi Gabbard vows to 'aggressively pursue' intel leakers

    Jump

  • Not sure who would be scared at this threat. Gabbard couldn't even aggressively pursue an education, let alone something important.

  • GitHub - rajnandan1/kener: Stunning status pages, batteries included!

    Jump

  • Doesn't support docker host names, which is a bummer. You have to use IPv4/6 and the docker IP for services to work correctly. The service setup is also a bit weird. You can't seem to delete a service once it's been made. You can only "hide" it. So I just set this up, and mistyped an IP, and now I have a service with only 70% uptime because the first few pings failed due to the mistyped IP. (https://x0.at/ZvM1.png) There doesn't seem to be a way to reset the uptime, or delete the monitor. You actually have to rename the service monitor to something random, and "hide" it, then remake your service like new.

    Seems weird.

    Nice dashboard though.

  • Anyone else having linkding problems?

    Jump

  • bookmarks

    low on disk space

    Goddamn boy, how many links you got? A million? lol

  • Best web archiving software for complex sites and sites requiring logins?

    Jump

  • wget is the most comprehensive site cloner there is. What exactly do you mean by complex? Because wget works for anything static and public... If you're trying to clone compiled source files, like PHP or something, obviously that's not going to work. If that's what you mean by "complex" then just give up, because you can't.

  • Best web archiving software for complex sites and sites requiring logins?

    Jump

  • wget.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Are you telling me that this, the most obvious question of legality of profit in the entire pipeline of uploading content since around 2013, has not been considered by any court up to this year of Arceus of 2025?

    Name another movie uploaded under this exact CC license has been striken down under DMCA for the same ideological reasons... You make it sound like this court case pops up every week, and it doesn't. There's no precedence as far as I can find--which means it's not a question which can be answered with any supporting empirical evidence. It requires a court case to say definitively if its legal or not.

  • Anyone else having linkding problems?

    Jump

  • Everything seems fine with 1.39.1. What's the docker log say? Also which version?

  • Key Fobs and Privacy

    Jump

  • Does this key fob log every entry/exit?

    Entirely depends on how the reader system is setup and configured. It's likely, but not a guarantee.

    He’s cautious with cell phones and leaves them at home, but wonders if the key fob could potentially cause problems.

    They're a passive, no power system. They require energy from the reader to function. They're not exactly GPS trackers, but maybe someone somewhere has figured out a way to track them.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • I don’t see how he could have violated his own license

    Because he gave others irrevocable permission, without any stipulations (including what platform they uploaded his content to), to upload his content. Period. It's a contract, and as such he cannot after the fact come out and say "oh, well, I have a problem with YouTube so you can't upload my stuff on YouTube anymore" because that breaks the contract (license).

    If the videos are monetized by the uploader, he has legal standing. But it's not currently known or understood if he has the legal authority to pull the content because YouTube is profiting from his content. That's up to a court to decide.

  • Is there a downside to sticking to iptables over ufw?

    Jump

  • UFW is a wrapper which just makes interfacing with iptables bearable. UFW is iptables.

  • Notes on coreutils in Rust

    Jump

  • The performance you're dealing with here is in the tens of milliseconds possibly hundreds if you're lucky. Anyone seriously pursuing this issue from the angle of performance genuinely doesn't understand the deep rooted issues here.

    If you're so incredibly hard up for compute time that it's critical for you to squeeze out the extra 1/10 of a second from your system utilities then you need to shut your fucking computer down and go touch grass.

    I mean even if this saves you 30 seconds a day 50 weeks a year 5 days a week that's 2 hours per year it's saving you.... I'd rather slow fuck the two hours and get an extra 2 hours of pay.

  • US could default on debt as soon as July

    Jump

  • It's actually difficult to state how bad it would be. People use the United States dollar as a reserve currency because it's a trusted currency. It generally maintains its value.

    It's in a precarious situation because it's not backed by anything but the Word of the United States Government. As soon as that government starts to default on loans there's absolutely nothing propping up the dollar as a reserve currency.

    People will start to look for alternatives immediately. Which will absolutely tank the value of the dollar which will lead to more people looking for alternatives which will take the value which will lead to more people looking for alternatives which will tank the value....

    Essentially you're looking at runaway hyperinflation until the value of the dollar reaches somewhere between literally shitting in your hand and a punch directly in the face...

    You think the price of eggs are high now? Imagine how high they're going to be when nobody will accept cash for them, only barter. Literal fucking Pokémon cards are going to be worth more than the dollar very very soon. And the worst part of that statement is it's barely an exaggeration.

  • Bernie Sanders is drawing record crowds as he pushes Democrats to 'fight oligarchy'

    Jump

  • None of them are fighting the oligarchy. There are several speaking out against it right now but none have the power to fight it apparently...

    One of the biggest problems with our system of government is that change has to be brought from inside. You have to use the machine to beat the machine, and it's very specifically designed that way to be as difficult as possible to change.

  • Thinking on switching to linux

    Jump

  • The linux ecosystem, depending on which distro you choose, has anywhere from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands of packages. There's only select software that you can't virtualize from Windows to Linux, so you may not even be required to find alternatives.

    But without listing any software at all, it's hard to tell you definitively...

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • That's a question for the court. It may sound cut and dry, but it's really not. In the US legal system, other people don't stop having rights just because you have rights. There are 3 entities at play here, the author of the work, the uploader, and YouTube, all of which have rights. But the author of the movie limited (intentionally) his rights by releasing the work under Creative Commons. The user has the right to upload the video to YouTube. That is not in question. The question is whether or not YouTube is beholden to the original Creative Commons license. They didn't upload the media, and the media was legally uploaded and for all intents and purposes must follow YouTube policy which is their right to monetize.

    This isn't a case of someone uploading a copy-written movie and YouTube making money off of it, it's much more complex and anyone telling you different doesn't understand the actual legal issue here.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Violation of his own Creative Commons license. It's a tenable contract in the United States--a contract between him and viewers, creators, and frankly anyone.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • He DMCA'd all versions of his movie, even the ones which were not monetized. This is not a good argument and won't hold up in court. Simple fact of the matter is, is that he violated his own license.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • You're kind of missing the point. He released the film under creative commons license, specifically Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported. The license specifically says;

    You are free to: share -- copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.

    Which of course includes YouTube. The license cannot be revoked as long as you follow the license, and sharing to YouTube doesn't constitute breaking the license. Which means he's breaking the license.

    He's very liable to be sued in this situation and he would absolutely lose.