Yeah, its running a website. All ports are on default deny except 22, 80, 443, and 9050. 9050 is for the onion version of the site, and 80 auto-redirects to the https version of the site. 22 is rate limited to help protect against brute-force attacks.
The requests are coming from multiple IPs, some of them are 117.72.47.192, 172.71.184.89, and 162.158.87.100. the one that sent that specific packet is 82.147.85.33 and no user agent is provided. Most of the malicious packets have user agents attached, but that specific one doesn't
I also am seeing another weird one sent by 138.197.16.14
"238\x00ll|'|'|SGFjS2VkX0Q3NUU2QUFB|'|'|WIN-QZN7FJ7D1O|'|'|Administrator|'|'|19-11-28|'|'||'|'|Win 10 Pro x64|'|'|No|'|'|S17|'|'|..|'|'|SW5ib3ggLSBPdXRsb29rIERhdGEgRmlsZSAtIE1pY3Jvc29mdCBPdXRsb29rAA==|'|'|" 400 166 "-" "-"
I got a piece of code from c/programming that works
Using body:has(#theme-toggle:checked)
I prefer doing it that way because I use a browser with anti-fingerprinting which hides the preferred theme so prefers-color-scheme doesn't work as well
I already have a dark theme set, I'm using catppuccin's colors
What I'm trying to have it do is when a button is pressed, it switches to the light version of it
Really they all work the same as long as they're based on the same OS. I've done a lot of distro hopping and the only real difference I've seen is the desktop environment, package managers(sometimes), and pre-installed applications.
Even then, all of these can be changed. I would suggest picking a distro that best suits your needs by default and then add what you need from there.
I personally have been really happy with Linux Mint.
what it protects against is group ideology. I don’t want to start thinking things simply because the political party I align most with thinks that, and unfortunately, identifying with a political group can make people start doing that. I do recognize my biases when making decisions, it's important to do so, I just find it becomes harder to do that when I start identifying with a group
what it protects against is group ideology. I don't want to start thinking things simply because the political party I align most with thinks that, and unfortunately, identifying with a political group can make people start doing that.
Well of course he should be charged for burglary and theft. He did commit those crimes, but I don't think he should be charged with murder. He didn't shoot the gun, the cop did. I'm not necessarily saying the cop should be charged with murder though.
Piracy won't be dying any time soon. Every software has its flaws. Sure, pirates will hit a couple rough waves, maybe a storm or two. But piracy will continue.
Yeah, its running a website. All ports are on default deny except 22, 80, 443, and 9050. 9050 is for the onion version of the site, and 80 auto-redirects to the https version of the site. 22 is rate limited to help protect against brute-force attacks. The requests are coming from multiple IPs, some of them are 117.72.47.192, 172.71.184.89, and 162.158.87.100. the one that sent that specific packet is 82.147.85.33 and no user agent is provided. Most of the malicious packets have user agents attached, but that specific one doesn't I also am seeing another weird one sent by 138.197.16.14
"238\x00ll|'|'|SGFjS2VkX0Q3NUU2QUFB|'|'|WIN-QZN7FJ7D1O|'|'|Administrator|'|'|19-11-28|'|'||'|'|Win 10 Pro x64|'|'|No|'|'|S17|'|'|..|'|'|SW5ib3ggLSBPdXRsb29rIERhdGEgRmlsZSAtIE1pY3Jvc29mdCBPdXRsb29rAA==|'|'|" 400 166 "-" "-"