Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)W
Posts
5
Comments
1585
Joined
11 mo. ago

  • Only left it twice!

    Oh, and the fun kind!

  • Yes. And so did every other leftist you see on here talking about the Biden/Kamala genocide problem. But no matter how many times folks like you are reminded of this, y'all just keep going on and pretending otherwise.

  • I mean, you could inject say, 6 mg of estradiol enanthate weekly. That would produce dry climax for most people. Though, there may be some...undesirable side effects, depending on your perspective....

  • I mean you could take a 6 mg injection of estradiol enanthate weekly. That would produce the effects you want. Though...it...may also have some other effects...but anything's work it for a dry climax, right? 😈 😆

    /s for the dense.

  • Don't be rude. Don't accuse others of wanting a negative outcome. Don't assume how people voted, because you just assumed wrong.

  • Again, in making such decisions, all we can judge by is the evidence in front of our eyes. I observe:

    1. Liberal parties currently in power in Anglo countries are offering no meaningful resistance to Israel. None have stopped weapons shipments.
    2. There is broad refusal among the Democratic centrists, who Kamala is a firm member, to endorse Mamdani, primarily due to his stance on Israel.
    3. A continuation among Democratic party leaders to hold the line on Israel. Congressional Democrats haven't used what limited leverage they do have to slow the flow of weapons to Israel at all.
    4. A complete silence on Kamala since the election on the Israel issue. She's still a very influential voice in the party, and she still has political aspirations. She now doesn't even have the Biden admin keeping her on a short leash.

    I am a scientist. I try to make judgments based on what I can directly observe. The default stance of centrist Democrats and of every liberal government in the Anglosphere has been continued unconditional support of Israel, even to today. And since Kamala hasn't stated anything to the contrary, the median observable behavior of politicians like herself is the best predictor we have of how she would have behaved as president. If you take a dispassionate evidence-based view of the issue, it's pretty clear that there would be no difference in the Gaza outcome between Kamala and Trump. Their policies are both 100% full support of the Israeli regime. Trump is just a lot more crass and cruel about it. Kamala virtue signals, Trump vice signals. But in terms of actual policy outcomes, their Israel policies are identical.

  • Over a hundred thousand Gazans were murdered on Joe Biden's watch. That isn't propaganda, that's simple fact.

  • The best predictor we have of how Harris's government would behave is Harris's own words and the actions of the labor government in the UK. Both of them are indistinguishable from Trump's current policies. Remember, it was the Biden administration that started the ethnic cleansing plan.

    But something tells me you'll respond how Democrats usually respond. Literally sticking your fingers in your ears.

  • I would think the aerosol or particle based shields would be even easier to remove than something up in orbit. The stuff in orbit will need to be pretty high up if you don't want it to immediately decay and reenter, so anything in orbit will remain that way for some time. Plus there's Kessler to worry about. But sulfurs and other aerosols wash out of the atmosphere pretty quickly. That's the whole reason people talk about termination shocks, and fret that we'll have to keep the aerosol effort continuously going. To me this seems like a virtue. If at any time we decide we don't like the effects, we can simply stop. There's no long term commitment.

  • Be nice

    Jump
  • 500 cigarettes.

  • Thanks!

  • What's a good alternative nowadays for someone who isn't super tech savvy and just wants to set up a basic WYSIWYG website?

  • Social networking sites were a great idea. Social media sites were where it all went wrong.

  • You can't even post a youtube link on there without a socialist bot scolding you for not instead using some janky commie tube alternative.

  • I mean, North Korea itself is literally run by grown adults.

  • We'll build the homes in the flood zone, but only let beavers live there.

  • I mean, I have been looking for a cult to join, if you were looking to start one.

  • I was going to go with Marx. Turns out religion is the LITERAL opiate of the masses!