A fairer society where people largely take care of one another, or a society structured primarily to extract wealth from others with all those problems...
Pointing to a description of a society that on the face of it is better than ours, and saying that they still have some of the problems that we haven't solved isn't much of a point.
It would have been uncivil - and as we all know, the most effective way to fight fascism is by letting them run roughshod over you while smugly pointing out how correct you are, and that they're breaking the rules while adjusting your policies to be a watered down version of the fascists, exciting the fascists, liberals, and leftists at the end time.
If the Dems get another election and don't pick a left populist like Sanders, they're finished.
What's going on with MTG right now? Release the results of the congressional investigations, allowing the crooks and paedophiles to be driven out as the cripplingly stupid welfare queen red states seceed to starve as the blue states enter an era of prosperity... Broken clocks and whatnot, I suppose.
In markets the typical response to a sudden shortage is an ________ in ______, leading to a reduction in demand, as the demand shifts to alternatives (other destinations, non-consumption) until a new equilibrium is found.
That's right - an increase in pricing reduces demand by pushing people to alternatives, reducing demand.
Thank you - that's interesting - particularly the quote about making him uncomfortable.
I'm surprised that the shifting Overton window, which has left the Democrats far closer to Reagan than MAGA, (who are busy speed-running fascism) hasn't swept up more Reaganites, but that boils down to naivete on my part, I think.
Whatever the case, I certainly agree that the Dems need to move from institutional neolib/neocon positions to populist left positions, but that's the last place the party wants to go - even when failure to do so represents an existential threat to the party.
I think you meant serial rapist, paedophile, fraudster and insurrectionist, who has the support of a third of the country and who knows how much money.
Why did Netanyahu sacrifice Israelis to refuse multiple ceasefires and hostage exchanges?
...but more relevantly, for the 4th time, you genocide defending piece of shit, why did Israel fund Hamas' displacement of the secular moderates with predictable results?
There's a reason you're refusing to answer the question - it's perfectly clear that Netanyahu is willing to sacrifice Israeli lives if it means that he can kill more Palestinians. You keep stating the obvious in an incredulous tone because you don't have an alternative explanation - there isn't one. You tell us you see the truth, then get all shy about it.
Go cheer for more dead Israelis, ya antisemitic piece of shit.
A fairer society where people largely take care of one another, or a society structured primarily to extract wealth from others with all those problems...
Pointing to a description of a society that on the face of it is better than ours, and saying that they still have some of the problems that we haven't solved isn't much of a point.