Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)V

VerPoilu

@ VerPoilu @sopuli.xyz

Posts
2
Comments
94
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Google Chrome change that weakens ad blockers begins June 3rd

    Jump

  • Google Chrome change that weakens ad blockers begins June 3rd

    Jump

  • Browsers based on chromium do not have to follow exactly what the main branch is doing. If they want to keep supporting MV2 or support different rules for MV3, they can. Albeit it's a bit cumbersome.

  • Google Chrome’s plan to limit ad blocking extensions kicks off next week

    Jump

  • Unfortunately, I think that while ad blockers won't work as well, they will still work good enough that most won't bother making the switch.

    https://blog.getadblock.com/how-adblock-is-getting-ready-for-manifest-v3-6cf21a7884f6

    https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/

    https://adguard.com/en/blog/adguard-mv3.html

    https://www.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/1067als/comment/j3h00xj/

    The main issue I see is the slow update of filters (which require an extension update). This might make YouTube win the cat and mouse game. Where YouTube updates(ed?) their blocking detection multiple time a day.

  • Can I refuse MS Authenticator?

    Jump
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Firefox's implementation of manifest v3 doesn't come with the same restriction as Google's. Ad blockers will still work with manifest v3 on Firefox (but not on chrome).

    This means that all manifest v3 extensions made for Chrome work with Firefox, and almost all manifest v3 extensions made for Firefox will work with Chrome.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • They already support manifest v3, but with less restrictions than Chrome's implementation.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • PGSub - A Giant Archive of Subtitles For Everyone

    Jump
  • Deleted

    deleted by creator

    Jump

  • It would be crazy expensive to run an attack of this size for years.

  • Deleted

    deleted by creator

    Jump

  • There is no way a DDoS on the website in affecting the crawler. Also, running a DDoS attack of this size costs a lot of money (if you rent the network, if you own it it costs money as lost sales). No one is giving AI control over a DDoS network to just fuck around.

  • Deleted

    deleted by creator

    Jump

  • There is no domain name associated with the IPs.

    Most importantly, usually, DDoS attacks use infected devices (PCs, mobile phones, smart fridges, shady browser addons etc...) to get many ip addresses and devices/locations and attack from everywhere at once.

  • In Poland, Testing Women for Abortion Drugs Is a Reality. It Could Happen Here.

    Jump

  • "it could happen here" posted in "world news" 😂

  • I just want to say that I'm so happy that people are taking notice of privacy concerns in cars

    Jump