I don't see much of a difference between the two. That's why now I'm uninstalling everything I use everyday and put them back as "portable" variants - downloaded as tarballs from their sites, github, or downloaded from Arch's archive. Already did that with Telegram, Pinta and the browser, soon Audacious will meet the same fate cuz for some reason it uses GTK2, not GTK3 as it should. Plus, having them as tarballs means I can have better versions than those in mint's repo.
Too bad that pacman can't be used on Mint, that would be awesome!
There are other things that keep me away for the android version, no matter what menu they make.
Things such as:
• FFA doesn't have actual dials (like Opera for desktop and for android (OA)). Instead it pins whatever it wants on the so called "home screen" and often pins the same page 5-6 times. Bleh!
• if you happen to enter a "hole" in the reception, FFA loses connection with the outside world and the only thing that helps to fix it, is to reboot the phone. This used to be a thing with OA but I reported it and they fixed it like 3-4 years ago.
• doesn't have about:config.
• doesn't have even basic customization options, like setting up custom wallpaper in the browser, like OA does.
Generally, Opera devs seem to be more responsive to user suggestions. I suggested about:config for FFA at least a year ago, if not even longer than a year, people supported it but FFA still doesn't have about:config.
So at this point I'm staying with the desktop version only (+ a fork of it) bc I can customize it in any way I want.
It doesn't require much of a brain to customize wine.
I just checked GE and... no wonder nothing ever runs, it has nothing. It's literally a copy-paste of the original wine, only with a changed name. GE/original wine - 1.4-1.5 GB. My Wine - 4.3 GB. :D
This thing turned out ot be overrated and useless, just like Steam itself. I lost count of how many games won't run with any proton (GE included), whereas they run just fine with my highly customized wine 10.5.
I've often asked them if the cross was what killed their "god", what would they be wearing nowadays, if Jizzus was raped by a roman soldier and died as a result of that, but they never answer. 🤣
And they're carcass worshippers. Think about it: they collect and pray to the body parts of different "saints"- hands, legs, skulls. etc. If you look through their own commandments, they'll be the first on the line to their hell. 😆
The clown Chump turned the whole country into a circus once again... When will the Americans finally get it that Chump doesn't belong in the WH? That fascist will eventually drag the nation into a war. It's brewing anyway already. The pumpkin I bought 2 days ago has more IQ than him...
I installed that today. Finally! Years after GE release, I managed to install it with the help of an AI bc nobody explains anything properly, except for the AI.
Hopefully with GE I'll stop seeing 130 GB log files from Forza 5. 😂
Plasma has a not so bad GTK integration which allows GTK apps to use plasma defaults. Also, GTK apps that weren't written by Gnome also have some good integration with other desktops. Only those written by Gnome are hardcoded to use only GTK styles.
Yes, but IDK of any other way to change the buttons ISOmorph was asking about. The only other way is to find and change/remove them in FF source code and recompile which needs a supercomputer to do, otherwise it may take days to recompile.
I assume he doesn't want to waste days on recompiling, so that's one way to change things. With GTK3-NOCSD (mostly + some other customizations) my title bar always looks the same way, no matter what changes Mozilla make to it:
I have no idea who that is but I do know who deserves to go to hell, if it existed: Mark Suckerberg.