Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)U
Posts
0
Comments
240
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Because he wants everyone else's data on it so that he can exploit it. He doesn't care about the data of his own people - he doesn't even want it recorded.

  • SR Venus, SSR Mars (or UR in some games)

  • Hey nice, you found evidence that it's not a recent trend at all for Democrats to fail elections because they can't be bothered to even talk about anything left enough. 40 years it is.

  • It's on purpose, and it's also accurate if their own common sense is "kill everyone."

  • Not having sex doesn't make you at fault. Rapists make that claim to pretend they're right. But they are not, they are lying. Only rapists defend that lie.

    You start from the conclusion that it makes you at fault, and you deduce that it must be part of the vow. Your reasoning is nonsense, you are trying to justify a conclusion that is already wrong by inventing a premise that doesn't exist.

    There is no such thing as a promise for sex in marriage vows, you fucking clown.

  • No no, that's the joke

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape_laws_by_country

    France Explicitly criminalised The law criminalises rape, including spousal rape, and domestic violence, and the government generally enforced the law effectively. The Court of Cassation authorized prosecution of spouses for rape or sexual assault in 1990. In 1994, Law 94-89 criminalised marital rape; a second law, passed 4 April 2006, makes rape by a partner an aggravating circumstance in prosecuting rape. (Article 222-24(11) of the Criminal Code)

    I figure the crux of an argument would more likely rest on defining consent, which is where there's always progress to be made.

    Also there was a massive trial that ended just recently about the mass rapes of a wife who was drugged to sleep by her husband and offered to people for years without her knowledge. Of the 50 guys including the husband, most of them got prison I think.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rapes_of_Gis%C3%A8le_Pelicot

    All over the news for months here and it made some degree of International noise, at least in Europe. Dunno about the US.

    Edit to your edit - "not true anymore" is an understatement, it hasn't been true for 30 to 35 years.

  • By calling it "starting a war" (which is a lie) and insisting that it has never gone well, you are implying that they should lie down and let Israel genocide them. Because that's how that goes.

  • You're mixing up what people say and what they think. Biden and Blinken both denied the war crimes and the genocide, and we have evidence that they knew what it was. Nazi Germany might have spread propaganda about security, but they DEFINITELY knew they were exterminating entire "races". Maybe not the randos in the streets, but anyone operating in a camp or the government.

    Propaganda is not what these people actually believe, it's the tool they use to give cowards plausible deniability. Those participating actively, and those not stopping it.

    Yes, there are people who are in fact monsters.

  • Because you're calling that statistic a Nazi dog whistle, and that means you're saying it's fake / fabricated and pro-Nazi propaganda somehow. It may not be what you intended, but it is the meaning of the phrasing you used.

  • It's targeting what they want to sell you depending on what target group you are, it's never been what might actually interest you personally.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • emotional manipulation

    Also known as, communication.

  • The salesman: "anti-what?"

  • General no, but it happens, mostly in the Paris region - then again the regional trains of other big cities don't really make the news unless it's a big one, so I can't be sure.

  • I was pretty sure the fucking DOJ didn't care that Trump instigated Jan. 6. And when the people saw that it was going nowhere fast, their money became more important. It's not like voting for Harris was going to change anything anyway, none of the investigations were pointing anywhere to jail time or barely a conviction. Even the only one that went well is ending with the judge signalling that there will be absolutely zero jail time or fine or literally anything in the upcoming sentencing. What the fuck are the voters expected to think of it?

    The only thing this article is talking about is that actual treason and attempted coup are used as a boogeyman being waved around to tell people to "vote for us or it will be worse" but never actually doing anything about it. Now they lost because they ended up doing nothing about anything. "There's nothing that comes to mind that I would do differently."

  • Have you ever thought you should stop him?

    I've never thought that because I'm dumb! No d'uh, only a dumb person would never think about that. If you think I've never considered it, you're basically calling me dumb.

    It is sarcasm.

  • ... so the article is right? They ask him if he's thought about stopping his dad's tweets. He's the one saying "no because I'm an imbecile" , but you know, that's sarcasm, he's putting words in their mouth - because that's how he interprets their words. He's saying that asking him this question is the same as treating him like an imbecile. So the article is correct that Junior says they treat him "like an imbecile" , because that's how he interprets their attitude towards him. That's exactly what he's saying.

  • You know he's really talking about Democrats. He rails against open disregard for court rulings, disagreement with the Supreme Court, threats and intimidation of judges - he's not saying that the MAGA think they're above the law, he's claiming that he is the law and the ones being dangerous and threatening are the Democrats who disagree with him. And probably those who want to investigate the ethics of the Supreme Court too obviously, that's the real threat and intimidation. People like him are shameless like that.

  • Having a drink?