Why drop rosaries when you get killed in 3 hits (for about all of act 1 at the very least) and come across a dozen enemies that bait and dodge every input you make and spike traps within a couple screens every time you die and you get killed a second time on your runback anyway
I'm a bit confused, I'm not sure if you mean the US or the UK, because both countries have done that, and both lands have been populated with that same method as well.
In the US? ... Obama? (In a very big nutshell) as long as you don't oppose stuff like the Dreamers and Obamacare (which you shouldn't under this definition)
By the way, I think this bit
Conservatism holds that if things are pretty good, most changes are likely to make things worse and not better
Is the biggest discrepancy in each person's understanding. If things are good...for who? What if they're not? If they are for 51% of people, what about the other 49%?
If you understand some stuff is good for you and some stuff is very bad for everyone else, do you block everything?
If only your situation changes and nothing else, do you switch parties?
You built up your very own definition of the word while ignoring what any political conservative movement in the world actually does. You listened to someone's argument on the concept of a definition, an idea that was stapled to a word in your head, without actually looking at factual reality. What you describe is simply not what any conservative party anywhere does.
Starting with the idea that you are conserving something that runs well and not spending resource on frivolous nonsense that doesn't work - just look at everything a conservative party actually funds while blocking money for anything remotely humanitarian because they claim it doesn't work, or based on the slightest disagreement about a boundary, while being themselves the very reason it doesn't work.
Look at what is actually protected. And at who isn't, based on not giving too much to someone you don't think deserves it. Do those who already have all that deserve it?
Starting with your environmental conservationist sensibility and deducing (edit: typo) that you want to be a conservative is already super wild, it's antinomic. You think you protect something from greed and selfishness, but those who who block progress are the selfish ones who hoard everything out of greed, using "this doesn't deserve it" or "you can't prove this works" as an excuse to keep everything. You are not safeguarding anything, and there's zero place for environmental protection in any conservative party anywhere.
You're only pronounced dead at the hospital AFAIK (or by a doctor or something), so even when your head just explodes, you have to wait until the ambulance makes it to the hospital to be pronounced dead. Doesn't mean you survived until they decided that chest compressions weren't working.
Romance of the Three Kingdoms and Water Margin were also written in the same period (14th to 16th c.) and are also heavy-handed that way. Romance pushes Liu Bei as the perfect Confucianist ruler restoring the Han glory (the same one that ended ultra corrupt and lived in luxury while everyone was dying of starvation from taxes and disasters), while throwing as much shit as possible on Cao Cao the reformer and usurper of the Han, and Water Margin starts with the first half showing a whole bunch of characters suffering from imperial oppression building up a large rebel group, only to turn around and have them say "actually all we ever wanted was to be part of the imperial army, let us beat up that other rebel group led by an evil wicked wizard and die to prove it" in the second half (which is actually the more historical part of it...)
Those are 3 of the 4 greatest classics of Chinese literature.
They call him tennou actually (heavenly king) but then when they were forced to open up, they heard of Napoleon and they thought damn that's cool, we'll tell foreigners to use that too.
Tennou has been in use for over 1350 years, and in the late 19th c. they thought their governmental subdivision (provinces) more closely matched that of France under Napoleon III I think (departments).
It's just a colloquial thing, a grammar book will tell you it's wrong, but people make up new words and meanings for long enough and things become commonly accepted and understood. It's also a cynical use of the word, and the fact that it feels off is also effective in telling you that the meaning should make you feel uneasy - for this word we are talking about a fascist government abducting people and actually everybody knows what happened, after all. It's perfectly cromulent, it doesn't have to be Tiktok lingo (but words like unalive may very well become acceptable too).
There have been empresses in the (distant) past, it's just that now they claim it's no good. They'll go back to it they really have no one else. Picking a different family is NOT happening, the Japanese line is the oldest continuous dynasty in the world (mythologically allegedly 2680 years, historically reliably something like 1400~1500 years and possibly 1800). It's a living treasure of humanity. They'll give up the system before they pick a new line, and they'll pick a woman before they give up the system.
You might have confused the full universe with the observable universe.
Right now, what we see at the "edge" of the observable universe is where it was less than 13.8 billion years away, because that light emitted back then from that spot took that time to reach us. But those things we're seeing have since moved away, and AFAIK they are now estimated to be 47 billion light-years away (for a total size of 94 billion light-years across), which seems close to your 1/4 number.
The idea behind that theory that the woman was one half suggests that prior to the split, it was one being who was half male and half female, not one man from whom woman was created. Also, that being was the one made in the image of God.
Enki, Sumerian god of water and knowledge, goes around distributing his semen to various goddesses for generations, and attempts to get busy with one who happens to be his great granddaughter, Uttu, after posing as a gardener. Ninhursag, the mother goddess of mountains, says no and takes out the semen from wherever he splashed it, then plants it in the ground. Various fruits, trees, vegetable, grass, plants grow from the place she planted it, and Enki eats them - to know what they are and determine their destiny because that's what he does as the god of knowledge. No kinkshaming.
Shortly after, Enki feels pain all over his body. Ninhursag asks where it hurts, and it turns out the pain comes from the plants and basically the semen is spreading inside his body. The top of his head hurt, Ninhursag removes the source of the pain which gives birth to a god of vegetation; a lock of hair, his nose, his mouth, throat, arm... give birth to multiple goddesses like Ninkasi goddess of beer, Nanshe goddess of the sea.
And then his rib hurts, and Ninhursag gives birth to Ninti out of it. Ninti translates to lady of life / lady who gives life, but it's believed that this part is a play on words that would mean lady of the rib. The Eve of Hebrew myth is thought to have been inspired by Ninti.
I don't know about versions of biblical texts, but the tradition that Eve came from a rib may come from people who were aware that this story was derived from Enki and Ninhursag. This myth involves a garden and stuff associated with the land of Dilmun, which was at some point connected to Eden. Plus Adam as a gardener eating the fruit to gain knowledge. Adam eats the seed of the apple but more like his own seed.
ETA: oh yeah, apparently Ninti "lady of life" literally translates into chavah in Hebrew meaning "to live" or "to give life" which became Havah then Eve. so Eve's name also carries that play on word with lady rib, except it was lost in translation (I'll just assume Hebrew for rib is different).
And there's additional hurdles for more targeted populations, like access to the place that gives you the ID, and the capacity to prove your ID to that place with specific documents that may ormay not exist. It's on purpose.
Well of course too much is bad for you, that's what "too much" means you blithering twat. If you had too much water it would be bad for you, wouldn't it? "Too much" precisely means that quantity which is excessive, that's what it means. Could you ever say "too much water is good for you"? I mean if it's too much it's too much. Too much of anything is too much. Obviously. Jesus.
Why drop rosaries when you get killed in 3 hits (for about all of act 1 at the very least) and come across a dozen enemies that bait and dodge every input you make and spike traps within a couple screens every time you die and you get killed a second time on your runback anyway