Is there anything morally different between pretending to be ICE to break into people's homes to rob them and actually being ICE and breaking into people's homes to rob them?
My conspiracy theory is it was chosen to deliberately harm the optics of environmentalists. Something with minimal useful impact and maximum inconvenience would turn people against the whole idea of environmentally friendly alternatives.
Because people who don't understand what words mean label every possible post-capitalist system as communism even though they're as different from each other as they are from capitalism.
A lot of Trump voters are horribly uninformed. They didn't know - and still don't know - what Project 2025 is. They thought it was fearmongering because they only heard about it from Dems. They have no idea what's happening right now, nor do they care. All they know is their team won, and they're otherwise tuned out. Maybe they'll wake up when they feel the effects, but they'll probably just blame Democrats because Fox News tells them to.
Is there anything morally different between pretending to be ICE to break into people's homes to rob them and actually being ICE and breaking into people's homes to rob them?