Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
4
Comments
294
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • "oaty: it's NOT a mammary secretion like milk"

  • Release the Trump Epstein Bondi files

  • This is criminal

    Release the Trump-Epstein-Bondi files.

  • Isn't Dr Oz prominently featured in the Trump-Epstein-Bondi files?

  • Discord just needs to die

  • Third party app block

    I didn't want their crappy client.

  • Garrison is a maga moron who contributed to Trump's ascent.

    Fuck that guy

  • That's so fucking on target

  • Honestly this sounds like mental illness in the person perceiving these smells, maybe with a little bit of OCD.

    In all seriousness I suggest that you speak with a doctor about this.

  • Awesome!

  • Copyright only protects a specific artistic expression, not a concept.

    So you can use the concept of a giant floating eye with ten eye tentacles that shoot lasers. Full stop.

    But you can't call it a beholder (due to trademark, not copyright), and you can't use their artwork of the concept.

  • Bullies gonna bully. I'm sorry this happened to you, but I'm happy you know who they are.

  • Dm me the discord link and I'll jump on

  • I would like to help. Please put me on the list.

  • Bless you, hero

  • I hate Microsoft edge with a burning passion, and Microslop tries to force me to use it when I click any link from Outlook

    Your tools actively make my job HARDER

    It is so obnoxious. Fuck Microsoft, fuck Edge, and fuck Outlook.

  • can you post a picture of what the single banana looks like? how much stem do you leave on each one? nothing? so the tip of the edible fruit is showing?

    I'm curious but kind of skeptical tbh

  • AGPL, along with all code contributed having copyright attributed to the project is the only true way. this is because MIT allows companies to internalize projects and completely co-op them.

    The important detail of making this work is creating secondary commercial licenses which companies can use in order not to reveal or contribute code back. this provides a mechanism for open source projects to make money, while protecting the end users. which have come to depend on it, or which may have contributed to it as an author. this need is why the copyright attribution to the project is necessary for all contributions.

    I cannot understand why this is not a more commonly chosen path. it really strikes the perfect balance between allowing companies to use code in whatever way they might need to (as long as they are willing to pay for it), creating support for open source projects, and preventing and shitification of successful open source projects which users support.

    importantly, any such commercial license is offered should include prohibitions against re-implementation, as well as time limits so that the software cannot continue to be used indefinitely if an unanticipated but non-breaching use creates risk to the original project

  • United States | News & Politics @midwest.social

    ‘Cruel and thoughtless’: Trump fires hundreds at US climate agency Noaa

    www.theguardian.com /us-news/2025/feb/27/trump-noaa-cuts-climate
  • United States | News & Politics @midwest.social

    Trump Takes Aim at Social Security in Dreadful New Layoffs Order

    newrepublic.com /post/192074/trump-social-security-layoffs
  • United States | News & Politics @midwest.social

    Spooked by public outrage, GOP aides urge lawmakers to reconsider future town halls

    www.salon.com /2025/02/26/spooked-by-public-outrage-aides-urge-lawmakers-to-reconsider-future-town-halls/
  • United States | News & Politics @midwest.social

    Minnesota MAGA power grab blocked by State Supreme Court

    www.peoplesworld.org /article/minnesota-maga-power-grab-blocked-by-state-supreme-court/