“I stopped to ask him if he was okay and he needed help, and he lied, and said that his mother works here at the post office,” the caller said. “And then he just took off away from me.”
Which is exactly that id want my kids to do, if some random person pulled up next to them in a vehicle. When in doubt get the fuck out of there
When trying to find out something ask the question: but why? 5 times. You need to try and get to an underlying cause, or in the worst cause you end up going around in circular logic. I was slowly trying to get you there, maybe badly 😐 In general most governmental problems come from underfunding, the Peter principle (people in a hierarchy tend to rise to "a level of respective incompetence") or just plane corruption.
Everyone is human and makes mistakes, it how we deal with those mistakes, and how others treat us about those mistakes we make.
So what you are saying is that when someone fails you should effectively write them off as a lost cause? Is it not the problem of the system that people can try and then fail. If the system worked then everyone that tried should succeed? So the good people that but the system in place have now tried and failed to educate/rehabilitate, much like the people they are educating/rehabilitating
But the article isn't about the average person, these are kids and young adults who for what ever reason are in detention centres. It's basic rehabilitation, and most countries get it completely wrong as they try to do it as cheaply as possible. I think the only country that gets this remotely right is Norway, everyone else is punishment first.
It's not a effective system if it fails in this way. Let's say 30% of people can't learn this way. 100 people per time period are entering the system, at the end you have 30 people left, now a new set of 100 join the 30, total of 130. The original 30 still can't understand but now there is an additional 30 at the end of the next time period, total 60 left. After 3 time periods you have almost doubled the initial amount of people. And have an effective rate of 50%, which very quickly will get lower and lower.
It's not a question about how many people get it, but how many people you leave behind. It often takes a surprisingly low percentage in populations for things to go or at least look bad
I'm confused, according to the documentary idiocracy, the US government is on track to have a president camacho, but Starbucks has pivoted to office space rather than handjobs. Maybe this is the purge they need to get back on track
If they are pulling in over €200k between them that's vastly more than a lot of people in europe, they must realise that. It's almost MEP level of salary.
Saying something along the lines of a €100 meal is half of my weekly salary should be all it takes, if it's the brother in law that's the problem, maybe just invite your sister over to visit you?
As soon as the kids are the school find this out I guarantee every single one of them will write queer or trans on the laptop, the system will get flooded and they will have to stop
So you would have a particle accelerator at your finger tips, for it to emit a low enough power for it to not be harmful to humans you want the radioactivity to be on the small scale. Basically a banana, you would be walking around with a banana in your hand. If we remove the requirement of it not been low powered to not harm humans, then we are talking about an instant cascade of particles coming from your finger in a cone, basically it would fuck everything up in its path
“I stopped to ask him if he was okay and he needed help, and he lied, and said that his mother works here at the post office,” the caller said. “And then he just took off away from me.”
Which is exactly that id want my kids to do, if some random person pulled up next to them in a vehicle. When in doubt get the fuck out of there