My jeans very rarely have actual pockets, so sometimes they have a back pocket for transporting my phone small distances, but if I'm going out it all goes in my handbag.
I took A Level Maths, and I just find it really tiring mentally far more than any other task I do, so after doing some practise and still having to do more, I found it draining and unpleasant. Some people say they enjoy the process, I just don't. I don't know exactly why, I just don't feel the same surge of pleasure that others do when they solve a problem I guess. I like programming though, which is applying maths, and I like being able to use maths to active my goals. I don't enjoy doing it for its own sake.
If saying something is 'good' or 'bad' doesn't in any way relate to what people should do, then it's about as meaningful as saying an action is 'zonk' or 'crinkey'
What would that actually mean though, for an act to be 'intrinsically good'? I understood a good act as meaning an act that is virtuous to do, but then surely what is virtuous is determined by personal values.
Maths is objective, yes. But maths is an 'is', while morality is an 'ought'. And you can't get an ought from an is without subjective values. And while maths is objective, any individual's understanding of it may be inaccurate.
I just had to install the NVIDIA proprietor drivers from Software on Fedora and reboot and it worked no problem. NVIDIA also has better software support for ML, so you're fortunate to have an NVIDIA card.
If they exist independently of us, where could they originate? If they originate from patterns, evolutionary psychology, or a god, doesn't it make it subjective, just to that thing, whatever it is?
Edit: nvm, I saw you replied to my other comment where I said something similar :3
...did you remove the default upvote from your own question? Before I upvoted it, it had 0 upvotes and 0 downvotes.