In a letter this month, Uthmeier warned publicly owned airports across the state that they must be in compliance with the new law, which requires public airports to report planes with weather modification devices to the state, and suggested that weather modification may have triggered the flooding in Texas.
“Because airports are most likely to catch those who seek to weaponize science in order to push their agenda, your compliance with these reporting obligations is essential to keeping our state safe from these harmful chemicals and experiments,” Uthmeier wrote this month.
So airports now have to report every fossil fuel or fuel cell* airplane and only purely battery-electric planes are allowed? Have fun shutting down every Florida airport. ;)
It's definitely easier to electrify maritime transport.
Long-range aviation might not be electrified at all because it's so hard to get enough energy from batteries without making the plane unable to lift off due to weight, or enough power from fuel cells without taking too much space. Instead we might see hydrogen turbines or synthetic fuel engines.
Either way, maybe we should ask ourselves if a future society should have flight at all? Of course it's cool that humans were able to achieve flight but right now it mostly serves an overheated capitalism and the short-lived pleasure-seeking of (globally speaking) a few fortunate people.
I'd love to upvote, but come on, that "Master of puppets" devilish Netanyahu just screams "antisemitic clishés". We don't need shit like that to criticize genocide and zionist propaganda.
Mh, '0' is a nonempty string, so !'0' returns false. Then of course !(!'0') would return true. I'd absolutely expect this, Python does the same.
And the second thing is just JavaScript's type coercion shenanigans. In Python
bool('0') # returns True because of nonempty string bool(int('0')) # returns False because 0 == FalseKnowing that JavaScript does a lot of implicit type conversions, stuff like that doesn't strike me as very surprising.