I'm not sure the specific name of it. Something like "women only" but I'm not finding it in search. I browse lemmy by all, so it comes up every now and then for me.
Lets say you go to a public building and in that public building there is a room marked women only, lets say in that room are some toilets, would you go in that room? Since it's a public space in the same building as all the other public space, the only difference is that portion of the space is understood to be only for women, or those that identify as women.
You may stumble in accidentally, and you will be gently corrected, but if you keep stumbling in, it's gonna start to seem weird, and the corrections will get less gentle.
Generally the idea is since it would take something like nanobots to repair the damage from freezing, whatever killed them is a simple repair beyond that.
It's not really about what is practical and feasible to recover from, it's just about what can get them the furthest into the future as intact as possible. Since it's gonna take decades or centuries for there to be any chance of success.
Is that not what the other commenters here are arguing? Cuz even when I ask them if that's what they are saying they keep answering like it is what they are saying, that I must not have gone to an american school. No, I didn't go to an american school, is it really that bad there? Like Canada is right next to the states, it can't be that much worse just crossing one border.
I don't get what you are saying? The kids didn't do anything wrong? Or they shouldn't also be in trouble? I don't get why everyone is saying the kids should be allowed to steal?
Yes I have been to high school, no kids didn't steal food from the teachers in my high school. But even if they did, they would have been wrong to do so...
Is it really a common thing nowadays for kids to steal from teachers? And not considered wrong when they do?
I really thought the reason it didn't mention the trouble the kids got in was just cuz including underage children in news articles has to be so redacted as to essentially be pointless unless they are the main focus of the article. Not that they are considered to have not done anything wrong nowadays.
I'm not arguing that she wasn't wrong, I state multiple times that she was wrong. He's arguing the kids aren't wrong at all. I maintain the kids also did something wrong.
So, it's your opinion that the kids did nothing wrong by stealing and eating the teachers food? They aren't even partly responsible?
So the parents get their kids home and they are ok with the kids stealing the teachers food, the teacher shouldn't have had food in the classroom since kids are allowed to just steal whatever they want.
Eating a parents food is a little more understandable, though still not something a kid should do without permission. Eating a teachers food, is down right actual stealing. It is different even if the teacher is supposed to act like a parent, though I haven't heard of that being the case, if anything teachers are restricted from acting like parents to the children.
They may have some legal burden, but it doesn't mean it should be treated exactly as if they are the parents in every situation.
But I did say it was fair that the teacher got in trouble, just thought it odd initially that it doesn't mention the kids repercussions, til I thought about the hurdles involved in writing that bit of the article and assumed they just didn't bother.
While I definitely get that she shouldn't have left them sitting out, is it not the fault of the kids randomly eating other peoples food without permission that the food ended up being much more "not for them" than it already would have been?
Well, I suppose just cuz the article doesn't mention the kids getting in their fair share of trouble doesn't mean they didn't, including underage kids in a news article is a hassle and barely worth doing when they are the main or only part of a story.
I definitely wouldn't say it's a certainty, but it's a pretty strong coincidence to have all three of those sudden outbursts back to back out of the blue if they are completely unrelated. And even if that didn't happen the odds were already high enough before making that connection.
That behaviour is very much in-line with those types of clubs. Whether the illegal thing be drugs, or sex stuff, or just the actual real life secret political clubs that were only about corruption and collusion, which sound super tame now, but are already bad enough. And those clubs do very often end up coming out that they were still infiltrated with spies, or started by spies in some cases. Like, these aren't uncommon or brand new, they have been around for thousands of years.
Well for me, the fact that an hour before it leaked, trump had 3 outbursts, one to the repulicans that are trying to get it released, one to the democrats about the same thing but more desperate and deranged sounding than normal, and one directly about how they are gonna look into bill clintons ties to epstein.... all an hour before we found out what he was mad about.... like we didn't even have to guess it was bill, trump basically told us by having no self control.
So, I guess he got a heads up about what was gonna leak.
Steam Frame is optionally just a Steam Deck with 'up to' a 4k screen that you don't have to look down at or hold up to your face. It can also be used for VR stuff, but otherwise it's just a better Steam Deck.
It's how I use my Quest 3 already 75% of the time, so it'll be nice to have a headset that had that use case in mind during It's design. And also one where I don't have to give meta money anymore.
Depends what they got for doing it. Sounds to me like an initiation ritual/insurance policy for joining a secret club... what secret club might they have both been a part of where they would think that was a worthwhile entrance fee?
Would he potentially do it if it was a requirement of joining the little girls sex club? Initiation rituals like that not only make it "safe" against people that would try to spill the secret, but photos of it act as insurance to further guarantee it stays secret. And since Epstein was a spy for various countries, it doubled as a way to control a bunch of powerful people.
Yeah, that's fine, a bit outside the metaphor as there is no analog.
Basically just that socially enforced boundaries are a thing even in public spaces.