Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
291
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Do you think that was because of the ban on the NSDAP or because of the unconditional surrender, execution of influential personnel and subsequent occupation of Germany?

  • I'm talking about the Beer Hall Putsch. Not the end of WW2, as that would 80 years ago.

  • And as we all remember, when the Nazi Party was banned 100 years ago, the problem was solved, just like that, and nothing at all happened afterwards.

  • That's not a counterargument lmao are you serious?

  • Holy non-sequitur

  • Perplexity is really good, I love using it.

  • What we've seen is the exact opposite. The state is running huge deficits, burning through its war chest, and the economy is very hot right now.

  • Yougov hat auf ihrer Website eine Prognose für jeden Wahlkreis, da sieht es aktuell nur nach einem in Berlin aus. Wenn dann werden sie es wahrscheinlich über die 5% erreichen müssen.

  • Why don't you answer the question?

  • They blocked the TikTok domain in China. What would you call that, if not a ban?

    You are naive if you believe they aren't going to sever the communities. That was always going to happen.

  • TikTok is banned in China, so why would anyone ever expect this would be different in this case?

  • I don't even disagree that it's a fine headline, but this community shits its pants everytime an article isn't extremely accurate in it's headline, so it's funny to suddenly have an army of people descent upon this comment section to defend specifically this one.

    "Some" would be more useful in this instance, as it would distinguish it from the general case. That's pretty standard behaviour for news headlines too, right? This study does not concern itself with iron age populations in general but specifically celtic communities between 100 BC and 100 AD in Britain.

  • I never implied that it would mean "every single man". That's a pretty strange way to read my comment.

  • The word "some" at the beginning of the headline would have been a perfectly acceptable qualification of the phrase which also would've better described the actual findings of the study.

  • Calling it now, it's not gonna happen. And I'll be back in this threat when dust settles

  • The only vibe I'm getting is "edgy 15 yo who just learned about politics"

  • Because there is no doubt China will surpass USA at some point in the very near future.

    There certainly is doubt. The population is already declining and the economy has been growing far slower, as of late, than it should. The US also has more powerful allies, we'll see how much damage Trump will afflict on that front. China's ascent seemed certain a decade ago, now it is doubtful.

  • Well, agreements aren't worth the paper they're written on if you can't enforce them when push comes to shove. I agree that the US is less interested in meddling in every affair all over the world, but it's a mistake to think that they're not interested in maintaining hegemony and their status as the pre-eminent superpower. That's the whole reason for the pivot to Asia, and both the Dems and Republicans are in agreement there: The goal is to contain China.