Adding to other's responses, exploding thing at geostationary orbit is especially bad:
there is roughly only one such orbit
because of (a) it is much more limited in terms of amount of spots for satellites distant enough from each other to be considered safe (imagine beads)
because of orbital mechanics destroying things creates cloud of debris that eventually takes up form roughly similar to torus, embedding original orbit, endangering all other satellites here and threatening to start chain reaction of creating more and more debris from collisions
this orbit is quite high and atmosphere here is so miniscule it'd take hundreds and thousands of years for that debris to meaningfully slow down and drop to lower trajectories; and junk that got higher orbits will decay even slower. It's not coincidence that graveyard orbit for geostationary satellites is higher
The hell is this comment section? Is every lemmy user some kind of IT person? There is place for text, there is place for calls, and there is even place for actual presence, all depending on actual problem and yours and other person's understanding of it and ability to articulate through different mediums.
Idk, depends on if that "greaterness" raises the bar for consent or introduces new/other limiting concepts, and their culture in general. Maybe they are extremely strict or the opposite, fuck everything that moves. I'd believe it's up to their own Harkness test to decide, after all, they have "greater" intelligence.
Upgrades, people, upgrades!