This explanation doesn't make sense mathematically, though. If the ratio of Democrat to Republican voters is fairly consistent amongst groups, increasing the number of people in any given group that votes will result in that same ratio, just with greater numbers. Saying otherwise is like saying you can add 2% milk to 2% milk to eventually get back to whole milk
The only way voting by mail helps Democrats is if the vote by mail crowd has a heavier democratic skew.
Ceballos also acknowledged that he “probably” voted for Kobach and former president Donald Trump several times because he automatically selects the candidates with an “R” beside their names.
Rotenone, nicotine, copper sulfate, and pyrethrin/pyrethrum (broad spectrum insecticide that harms beneficial insects) come immediately to mind. Copper sulfate's big issue is it breaks down quickly and needs to be frequently reapplied, leading to copper accumulation in the soil.
Locked
feddit.org's Zionist bar problem: community ban(s) vote
Mate, I may or may not be qualified to diagnose anyone and don't know this person intimately, but they're giving off serious cluster B vibes. You can't argue logic with a cluster B personality that doesn't want to hear it. There's the world we live in and there's the world they fabricate, and the harder you push them toward reality, the deeper they delve into their denial of it.
Eh? Are we reading the same things? I can't see why you think the comment called directly out as a response is the initial comment, which is also called out directly in the article.
I still question if that chilling effect was actually the movement or the fascist/conservative spin put on it to radicalize young men. It's practically identical to the anti-feminist propaganda that conservative political groups have been using for decades.
One could also downvote this because they disagree with your characterization of the movement. Even if the movement did result in what you claimed, it was never the intent nor the primary result, so it's a pretty obvious mischaracterization.
Your comment seems akin to "DEI exists to disenfranchise whites". Have DEI policies led to a more qualified white person being passed over for a job? Absolutely, but that's not the intent, so it's not indicative of DEI policies, but instead their misapplication.
The same logic applies to #MeToo. If people misinterpreted or misused the movement, that's not the fault of the movement itself but instead those people.
Oh noes, a woman gained weight while her husband, over half of whose extremely lucrative career is literally staying maximally attractive and fit, did not.
Clearly this situation teaches a lesson that applies to all of us. Clearly.
This explanation doesn't make sense mathematically, though. If the ratio of Democrat to Republican voters is fairly consistent amongst groups, increasing the number of people in any given group that votes will result in that same ratio, just with greater numbers. Saying otherwise is like saying you can add 2% milk to 2% milk to eventually get back to whole milk
The only way voting by mail helps Democrats is if the vote by mail crowd has a heavier democratic skew.