Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
1
Comments
465
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Been at work since 5AM... finally finished deleting the C-00000291*.sys file in CrowdStrike directory.

    182 machines total. Thankfully the process in of itself takes about 2-3 minutes. For virtual machines, it's a bit of a pain, at least in this org.

    lmao I feel kinda bad for those companies that have 10k+ endpoints to do this to. Eff... that. Lot's of immediate short term contract hires for that, I imagine.

  • Let me make it clear.

    If you have pedophilic tendencies... not even touching a child, but providing a child ANY sexually explicit material, you are a pedophile. And I have NO mercy for pedophiles.

    If that doesn't answer your question, that's your problem, not mine.

  • So why can't educators stick to the state mandated sex ed programs? Why veer off the curriculum standardized by the state?

  • So why do LGBTQ books.. have to be so sexually derogatory? Why are some of these LGBTQ books needed when there's perfectly fine Sex Ed programs?

  • I think there's people whose moral compass doesn't align with the common man on earth. And said people just see themselves as progressives for the better good without actually thinking about the repercussions. You may feel you're doing something right, but in reality it's negatively impactful.

  • Majority of what people? The Western World isn't the majority of the world. Much less the U.S.

    Pssst you are a literal minority across all civilizations on this globe.

  • That's rich... let NBC and MSNBC know how you feel as a Dem/Progressive/Leftist etc..

  • What does a story about a boy sucking off another boy in some sort of homo-erotica material have anything to do with sex education? That is pornographic material. And if you need examples, go through my comments/replies and review the two youtube videos I posted.

  • No.. I'm well aware that this community is a leftist/progressive community and your form of progress is a degenerate, decaying form of progress. And when I see something absurd, I call it out or at the very least question it. You're right, I'm wrong, because I go against the grain. And you feel like you're right because of your collectivism. Doesn't make it right nor moral.

  • No one said, "promoting free and open access to information is an act of pedophilia". Providing children direction/guidance/access to pornographic material on the other hand... Is an act of pedophilia. It is a grooming tactic. At best you can call it, "sexualizing children". And that is still fked.

  • Some of them are definitely pornographic material.. as I've already listed 3 of them.

    Let me re-iterate it:

    The Brooklyn Public Library's Books Unbanned project makes its collection available to young adults and teens who face censorship, book bans, and political challenges. The collection includes thousands of audiobooks and ebooks, which can be accessed on a computer, Kindle, or phone or tablet using the Libby app. Some books in the collection include: Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe All Boys Aren't Blue by George M. Johnson The Bluest Eye by Toni Morrison

  • Pornographic material is for adults. Right? So how is it unacceptable to restrict CHILDREN access to pornographic material?

    Or is your moral compass backwards? Because if that's the case, then so be it.

  • Wat. lmao did you just... use homosexuality as a personal attack?

    At this point I'm going to back off this thread.

  • Nice... now go ahead and learn about some of the tactics pedophiles use on children before any sexual intercourse occurs. Grooming.

  • Oh, let me know if you need more videos of children and parents and communities reading some of the literature.. I can assure you, BlazeTV is the least of your worries.

  • When you sexualize (groom) a child, you're preparing them to be willful victims of pedophiles. This is what YOU support by making excuses for pornographic material to be pushed onto children.

  • So you support child grooming, got it.

  • If you commit acts of violence, does that not make you a violent person? She committed an act of pedophilia, on multiple children. That makes her a pedophile. Pedophiles are groomers and groomers are pedophiles.

  • ... I was almost a victim as a child. It was terrifying. And knowing that feeling of soon to being a victim is fked up for a child. More than likely the reason why I don't trust a single human being, because their 2nd person, the person that the public doesn't see, could be a fkin degenerate of the worst kind. So anyone trying to sexualize a child, putting them into parades with naked adults, providing children with pornographic material to pique their interest and try things out.. all of that, imo, deserves only one form of punishment, not even worthy of a grave site.