Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
165
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

    There is no intent to destroy even in part the Palestine people.

    If there was this would be a whole lot more than 40 thousand deaths in nearly a year of fighting. And don't forget of those deaths how many are terrorists they are fighting?

    They only had to do 1 for it to be considered a genocide.

    They have to do it while having that intent. It's clear imo it's not their intent. Their intent is to destroy the Hamas terror organization.

  • They literally released an updated death count today. 39,653 as of today.

    What are you talking about "unable to update stuff due to being bombed out"? Literally. You make things up.

  • The Palestine health ministry announces an updated death toll nearly everyday. What. Are. You. Talking. About.

  • What in the fuck are you talking about lmfao. Palestine-Arabs launched that war in 1948. They launched a brutal attack involving 8 of their Arab countries because they did not want a two state solution.

    So you know what. There is also 40 years(75years) of context that Israel became less and less faithful in a peaceful solution.

  • Israel could level all of Gaza and West bank if they wanted to like in less than a day. 40k(maybe more than half terrorist Hamas) dead in a year is such an annihilation. Damn they really made a dent in that 5.5million.

    The people already support Hamas before any of this. That's why Hamas governs them, they got the majority vote in their election. Make it up as you go why they "may turn to Hamas in desperation" they turned to Hamas before there was ever a war.

  • Yes true. The billions and billions we sent them in aid was no help. We have never helped them. Somehow they kept themselves fed and taken care of.

  • That's cool. Reality is quite credible though.

  • I think they should have stopped while they were ahead.

  • When reality is some kind of elaborate trivial argument. I don't spin anything I literally point out what has factually happened in reality since 1947. Of course they tell a sob story as they face the consequences of their own actions. Even through it all they still support Hamas. 80% think Hamas did nothing wrong October 7th. So why shouldn't we victim blame? Will they accept peace? Doubt it. If they want war so damn much then that's their problem why is it mine?

    80% of them even dislike America according to this 2014 paper. Their biggest financial backer. Y'know the one who provided food and medicine to their exponentially growing population all while our own country faced our own crazy ass problems somehow we found the money to provide them aid. And 3 of every 4 of them dislike us. Okay lol. I'm suppose to feel sorry or something?

  • Same with you. When they attack it's "yeah but the overblown atrocities they've faced over the decades" "look what they've done to them over the decades"

    Meanwhile in reality land Israel housed, fed, provided medicine allowing their population to grow from 500k to 5.5M. They let them continue after Palestine launched a full blown invasion to destroy Israel from the world in 1948. Even after losing they let them prosper all these decades.

  • They could have accepted that two state partition plan back in '47. Instead they launched a war on Israel months later trying to remove it from the map. They don't want peace. They won't take a two state solution. 80% of them currently support and agree with what happened October 7th. They currently support Hamas, just like they supported them when they voted for Hamas which ran on "we are going to destroy Israel."

    This past few decades they have been housed, fed, their population exponentiallly grew and continues to grow from 500k in '47 to currently 5.5 million. But no yeah, evidence of apartheid and trauma and whatever lala land fairytale they sell you.

  • Ohh no. Did they fail to raise an army and go to war?

    Anyways let's debunk this crap. There was no Palestine in 1946 Palestine before 1946 was Arabs. The green in 1946 represents a million arabs living there and the white represents half a million Jews. Your map leaves out the British mandate land given to those Arabs of that time. That land known as Jordan today with 70% Arab Palestine descent.

    Your last map is pure bullshit. Their population has swelled in numbers since 1946 from 100k population to 5 millions? Yet it portrays an ethnic cleansing? Riiiiiight.

    Your 2nd map was the two state proposal offered in 1947 which the Arabs declined and proceeded to try and destroy Israel off the map in 1948.

    Your third map is the consequences of them wanting to destroy Israel imo but whatever something something atrocities something something no partition plan no Israel.

  • what are the implications?

    My last 2 comments. 😉😉

    We've gone from doing medical blood tests in woman boxing to who cares they die anyways let them die and beg for it first. And you still ask what I'm talking about lmao.

  • Oh yeah, atrocities we committed on them. Supporting their exponential population growth. All the aid we send them. 60% of their population children? And growing.

    Damn. We really committed atrocities toward them. How dare we send them billions and billions in aid. They fucked and fucked and partied so hard from such horrendous atrocities.

  • Can you believe 80% of Palestinians currently support the October 7th attack as well as support hamas even after all this shit? It's mind boggling how they had it all and here they are. They choose to do and support this crap.

  • Me personally I'm going to stick with number of deaths as reported by the gaza government. Which has been proven over this past decade to have accurate numbers through multiple mass-casualty events.

    Not conservative estimates or whatever crap the Lancet is trying to push.