He's laughing at them for fools because they don't follow from understanding in either case. In the beginning, they believed scripture because of what it said, not because it came from a place of understanding beyond understanding scripture as authority. In the latter - in the new order - they believed in everything he said because he was learned, entirely from his authority rather than from a place of personal understanding
You seem pretty invested in third party bias raters. Personally I think they're crap because they just follow the overton window and in the US that means they count center right content as leaning left, e.g. The Economist.
But if that really floats your boat, you should use Ground News as one of your collators
Of course, I just don't want anybody on the sidelines to think this turd's lazy bullshit has credibility. Rubbing their nose in their willful stupidity is also fun, heh
No, it's because you've posted 300 articles in a month from breitbart level publications. If you're doing it for free you are a chump who needs to get a life
Being in an echo chamber is bad. Utilizing RT, Breitbart, OAN, or Truth Social does not improve the situation, though, and probably makes you even less informed due to disinformation than the echo chamber. If your diet is impoverished, eating more twinkies will not improve your health.
I don't know about that. I've been running Mint, an Ubuntu based distro, for over a decade now on tons of machines with no stability issues at all. But then again I make sure to buy hardware that is known to support linux well. All of my laptops have been from Tuxedo except for this last one which is a Framework.
