Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
0
Comments
12
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Not having access to Alexa and other invasive products sounds liberating, not a punishment.

  • The tools to manufacture content are more accessible, sure. But again, information has always been easy to manufacture. Consider a simple headline:

    [Group A] kills 5 [Group B] people in terrorist plot.

    I used no AI tools to generate it, yet I was able to create it with minimal effort nonetheless. You would be rightfully skeptical to question its veracity unless you recognized my authority.

    The content is not important. The person speaking it and your relationship of trust with them is. The evidence is only so good as the chain of custody leading to the origin of that piece of evidence.

    Not only that, but a lot of people already avoid hard truths, and seek to affirm their own belief system. It is soothing to believe the headline if you identify as a member of Group B and painful if you identify as a member of Group A. That phenomena does not change with AI.

    Our relationship with the truth is already extremely flawed. It has always been a giant mistake to treat information as the truth because it looks a certain way. Maybe a saturation of misinformation is the inoculation we need to finally break that habit and force ourselves to peg information to a verifiable origin (the reality we can experience personally, as we do with simple critical thinking skills). Or maybe nothing will change because people don't actually want the truth, they just want to soothe themselves. I guess my point is we are already in a very bad place with the truth, and it seems like there isn't much room for it to get any worse.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • If you just want to know when the clothes are dry, there's an easier way that keeps you in full control: put a ct clamp on the power cord. Doubles as energy monitoring. You can then block that crappy wifi spying system off altogether.

  • "We should restrict the free use of oxygen because terrorists can breath it to sustain themselves."

    C'mon. Crypto has issues, but this ain't one of them. Pandering to people's fear is how fascist seize power for themselves and perpetuate the horrors we feared in the first place.

  • The electorate is the final check on power. The electorate failed their responsibility. The electorate now has to suffer the consequences of their actions.

  • Trump's power is not derived from a piece of paper. That was the Democrats mistake.

    Trump's power comes directly from the people. In a democracy, ultimately the people get the last say.

    The transactions are far from over. There are many more transactions to come. From as little as continuing to support Trump-freindly representatives, all the way up to not actively rebelling against his administration.

  • If we don't learn, then WTF are we doing with ourselves. The human existence is the pursuit of knowledge. The only depressing thing here, IMO, is the idea that living out a life as grazing cattle, concerned with nothing more than gorging oneself with the next meal is the only reason to live.

    Comfortable? Sure. Self-actualized? Not a chance. There's more to life than living out only the most basic biological needs.

  • You've got bigger problems than labour relations when "having a pleasant feminine voice" is the success criteria you use to measure the performance of a reporter.

    I dunno, this logic sounds exactly like the fucked up logic that went on in the conference room that dreamed up this shitty idea only to have it face reality and be pulled on day one.

  • It's faster until you need the human operator to keep coming over because the anti-theft sensors keep getting tripped up by false positive readings. Or you need to find some vegetable code that a normal cashier has memorized.

    Self checkout is great when it's done well, and total shit when poorly executed. And unfortunately, it's not always just a matter of technology (which normally keeps improving); it's often a matter of business model: sometimes customer convenience is really important, other times loss prevention (which creates frustration) is more important.

    I've seen countless good self-checkout experiences backslide into crap experience because the business felt that a controlled client is more profitable than a convenienced client.

  • To be fair, robots kinda wear out over time too, arguably at a faster rate. At least living tissue can self repair.

  • What does "stale code" even mean in this context?

    Does that mean it falls behind stable? Just merge stable into your branch; problem solved.

    Or is this just some coded language for "people aren't adopting my ideas fast enough". Stop bitching and get good.