Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
帖子
2
评论
369
加入于
2 yr. ago

  • Even now, it says nothing about letting AI watch them.

  • Ok,

    Show me a PCE-E board that can do inference calculations as fast as a 3090 but is less expensive than a 3090.

  • Well yeah, but 10x the price....

  • If these companies used youtube videos in a way that circumvented their revenue stream in any way, then yeah, absolutely that's a problem. But that's a completely different issue not related to who/what is consuming the video

  • does not make it permissible for a human to cause the LLM to train on that data without permission of the rights holder

    Says who? These videos are out there for people (or things) to see.

    If someone was playing some videos to train their dog to to respond to a noise, what business is that of the rights holder?

    Show me were in the ToS over a year ago, where it says you're not allowed to train an AI on the video.

    Rights holder can't control what people are using the video for. They can control when and how it's delivered, but not who's actually watching it.

  • made out of clips he didn't have the rights

    See, and this is where your showing your ignorance in understanding how currently AI functions.

    Yes, it's possible the AI could go and make shittier videos with its new knowledge. As could the novice plumber in the example I gave.

    But the AI isn't copying clips of any videos.

    It's not a repository of the videos/pictures or words it was exposed to, that it just recalls.

    LLMs do not model the world - Sean Carroll

  • videos they stole

    They pirated the videos?

  • without consent,

    Youtubers still got paid for the AI views.

    What extra compensation do they think they are due?

    Dude learns how to do plumbing from plumbing channels, goes out and makes a business plumbing. I don't see why the author of said videos are entitled to prevent that or needs to give the plumber permission to do so?

    I'm sure I'll eat the downvotes from this group who'll shout FUCK AI no matter what the context is, But in this particular case, I don't see how this is a problem.

    Entity watched your video, and then went and did something that made money. It didn't copy your video, that's not how AI works. So copyright doesn't have a leg to stand on.

    You created a video garner views to make you money. This thing saw your video, you made your money.

  • Do they make a compelling reason as to why it should be outlawed?

    What would it accomplish?

  • Where?

  • One interview with person at the rally, said there were 3 med-evac's

  • There's a higher chance Boeing will kill me than anything people bring on board.

  • This is essentially it.

    The core gameplay is great. Pulled us all in.

    The core gameloop is missing. I figured they would expand the game more and quicker.

    Like are we still only on Terminids and Automatons only?

  • No. Nukes make up the reliable baseload 24h/day

    Have you any idea how a modern day grid functions?

    The only other thing that can provide a reliable baseload 24h/day is hydro, which in upon itself is high $$$ to implement and has its own environmental issues.

    You should familiarize yourself with the complexities of grid management.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHFZVn38dTM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66YRCjkxIcg

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1BMWczn7JM

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G4ipM2qjfw

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwkNTwWJP5k

  • You know renewables aren't even the same thing as nuclear right? renewables aren't consistent and it's currently not possible to store the renewables anywhere.

    We already have over-capacity of renewables.

    Spending money on more doesn't help when there's no where to put that energy.

  • Doesn't matter if US has any keen interests or not.

    This Russian Invasion of Ukraine is no different than Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait.

    The only difference is the attacker is a permanent member on the UN Security Council.

    Otherwise something similar to Resolution 678 would have already been underway.

    But then the US went and really FUCKED UP, when they Bush Jr invaded Iraq in 2003 and ignored the UN Security Council

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_the_Iraq_War

    Russian President Vladimir Putin stated that the war was unjustified.[4] In a televised conference before a meeting with the US envoy to Iraq, Putin said that "The use of force abroad, according to existing international laws, can only be sanctioned by the United Nations. This is the international law. Everything that is done without the UN Security Council's sanction cannot be recognized as fair or justified."

    And showed Putin that the US/UK won't play by the rules, so now he has also ignored those rules ever since.

  • I'll integrate ChatGPT into my household when I can run it locally on my own server computer.

  • I've moved to fedia.io (mbin)

    kbin.social is always down, always spitting our errors/etc.