Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S

SchmidtGenetics

@ SchmidtGenetics @lemmy.world

Posts
125
Comments
1749
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • I insulted sir Gaben, steam and gaben are sacred on Lemmy. I spoke ill and got brigaded, happens to any comments like that. Could do without the blatant insults, surprised the mods allow it, or maybe they just haven’t gotten to it yet.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • Funny how month long idle accounts come out as well on those same votes, what does any of it imply?

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • I never said it was easy?

    Why do you keep insisting I’m moving the goal post?

    You said it was a walled garden, so it sounded like you weren’t aware that homebrew and modern cartridge releases exist. And are now arguing why those aren’t applicable to your “walled garden” comment.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • That’s literally what I’m trying to point out? They all have their own quirks. And yet people bicker it’s funny.

    I point out there’s limitations on PC, and get insulted. The circlejerking against Nintendo and for Steam is just wild on this community.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • Anyone can release a cartridge though? This part you’re ignoring.

    Why move the goalposts? You’re also now suggesting we gatekeep devs? Why is releasing something on pc fine, but wouldn’t be fine if it was “homebrew”? Because it doesn’t fit your bias?

    A game release is a game release, or do these limitations only apply to one side unevenly?

    Pc is FULL of shovelware, so that shouldn’t be the metric we use? Yeah?

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • How so? How can it be a walled garden if anyone can develop and release a game cartridge for it?

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • The games released on carts arent official games, but they’re playable on an unmodified console/system. Where do the goalposts get moved to now? Games are released on something you said wasn’t possible, so which is it?

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • Any non modern Nintendo console is capable of playing homebrew games, so this isn’t even true.

    People have released NES and gameboy games in the last few years. Even on carts.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • You said PC gaming is flawed because you can’t play modern games on a Windows 95 PC. Which is insane.

    I never claimed that. I said it was a limitation. Which it is. It limits its capability. Limitations are flaws, but that doesn’t make it flawed, it still works. Funny how words can have multiple definitions and you can choose which one to fit your narrative. Having to get a specific system to play the games you want, is cumbersome, it isn’t always easy, or even doable in some situations now.

    Quite putting words in peoples mouth, and again with the insulting when someone has a dissenting opinion. You don’t agree with me, that doesn’t mean I’m a sock puppet. Just shows you don’t want to have a civil discourse and go to fallacies.

    So yes it’s MORE exclusive in some situations.

    In almost all situations.

    … you agree the Pc is more limited in almost all situations now? That’s not my claim. I said some.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • Right, but it’s not freedom, when it doesn’t run on everything. You need to keep your system updated to play modern games.

    With a switch, any game released, you know will play.

    So yes it’s MORE exclusive in some situations.

    Nobody is claiming that you should run Black Myth Wukong on an old IBM Aptiva except you.

    Where? Don’t put words in peoples mouth if you want to have a civil discourse, but of course with this being your post, we know your bias already.

    The thing you are arguing for, literally has a list of games it CANT run… and it includes a lot of modern games as well as older, so it can’t even run them… nice non-exclusion eh? It limits on BOTH sides.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • able to run anywhere on hardware of your choice i

    So if this statement is true, an OS wouldn’t be a limitation.

    Of course tech is better, that’s why you can’t play on it anymore with anything modern. Do you seriously need this pointed out?

    And lots of old windows 95 programs don’t run on modern hardware, so if you bought something back then, you’re SOL with modern hardware. Limitations everywhere.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • A yes, a very insightful and polite response.

    Should have known trying to have a civil discussion about anything related to Nintendo would lead to trolls coming and brigading and insulting.

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • Having to buy from a certain store and being able to run anywhere on hardware of your choice is hardly more exclusive than being forced to buy from one vendor and only run on one system.

    But you can’t…? It’s locked to OS, and it doesn’t run on ALL hardware. There’s minimum specs, and you can’t play modern games on windows 95.

    Why do people ignore the glaring flaws while preaching the few okay ones? And the obvious lies too. The pros that people use, all fall flat when you follow them. You say all hardware, but it’s not, and never has been has it…?

  • What people miss about Steam Deck's "loss" to Nintendo

    Jump

  • Pc, where games are locked to launchers…? And OS…?

    They have their own flaws, so that’s not even a good counterpoint. They are FAR from inclusive, and far more exclusive in a lot of cases. HL3 would likely be a Steam exclusive, to think otherwise is just ignoring reality.

  • ChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logic

    Jump

  • Yea, in a chain where the first claim was, “ai was marketed as a be all end all”. If you want to support their side with civil discourse, please provide evidence. Because all you seem to be doing here is trolling.

  • ChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logic

    Jump

  • Can’t throw your hat in an argument, then balk when questioned lmfao.

    You’re joining an argument in the middle, doesn’t matter who said it first.

    Also. How do you propose I provide you evidence that’s it’s NOT marketed? The mere lack of it, and the lack of you being able to provide any, should be ample proof for someone wanting to have a civil discourse.

  • ChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logic

    Jump

  • ChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logic

    Jump

  • ChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logic

    Jump

  • Got a link? Because people just think it’s cool, not that it’s gonna be this thing that can do everything.

    So there must be some place people are getting this “it can do everything” idea from? It’s more an anti-ai propaganda angle, and that’s prevalent mainly on Lemmy. So a source to back up this “ai can do anything” please.