I read this then looked at it again. Now I kinda like it. The choices make much more sense. I've never experienced such a rapid shift in aesthetic preferences before. I don't know what else to say except, Thank You.
My wife and I rented a rental property using a process where neither the landlord or ourselves used a computer. We saw it advertised in the local weekly newspaper, drove by, and the landlord was cleaning. She hadn't advertised anywhere else. She asked about criminal history and jobs. But, she didn't perform background or credit checks. Only after we signed the lease did she ask to take pictures of our government-issued identification. We paid cash for the deposit and first month.
After decades engaging theory and praxis, after a half dozen books on the specific topic, after suggesting the core text on the topic to you, I now need to watch some fuckhead's video to explain the basics?
You're the moderator's alt. Objectively the algorithm says the writing styles are a very good match. Subjectively you're engaging the same tactic of introducing a red herring.
I see through you like glass. As soon as you realize that you'll ban me. But, you'll have no satisfaction because, right now, in this thing, I know you better than yourself.
I've many ideas. But, it's a red herring that I'll not facilitate.
The topic we're engaging on is that a moderator should be able to explain who organized the event they're supporting and why steaming video does not violate basic operational security.
I'll add that moderators that double down on logical fallacy probably shouldn't be moderators.
I'm brown. Yesterday, I was moving into a new place and asked a Trump-hat wearing,
ex-military boomer what day was trash day. He gave me an explanation of all the good and bad of the neighborhood, told me to use his trash bin this week, and invited my wife and I to dinner. When we showed up his wife asked why we didn't bring our dog because he's a member of our family.
Many things I thought I understood about others have recently been nuked by experiences.
Every action has a level of risk. Doing nothing is not acceptable.
ModeratorHat>
I see you.
/ModeratorHat>
Given all the evidence, it would be extremely unwise to attend this event.
The fact that you felt the need to speak as a moderator instead of defeating my claims with the facts and reason you should've had before you supported it should serve as a red flag to for yourself and others.
No one can identify the organizers. It's being held without the involvement of any group of organized leftists.
The guidance posted in this thread recommends streaming of video evidence and propagation of that video. This is a blatant violation of operational security.
Revolutionary events are never shared with major media outlets. Major media outlets would not propagate them.
Do NOT attend this event. You WILL be identified by your oppressors. It WILL become a threat to your security. We CANNOT save you from the consequences.
I'd say I'm an artist. But, not in a traditional sense. I see that many others said about what I said. And, I don't want you be discouraged.
When I'm creating something it's rarely very original. Others have already figured out how to "speak" to others with their art. My art is usually a copy of another's idea that I'd tweaked. Or it's an amalgamation of several ideas that I thought would work well together.
But, sometimes the point of creation isn't to speak to others. Or, perhaps I'm not saying what they'd like to hear. I think this is what's happened here. No one faults your workmanship. They're just recognizing that you weren't thinking about them when you created it while also finding no fault with that choice.
I encourage you to create and share again. This time, make a very conscious choice of who is your audience. Attach no guilt to a hypothetical choice to speak a language very few will understand.
My limited experience beginning with having never having been in any gym, ever, until my 40s:
Most adults that are regularly working out in the gym judge the beginners as courageous. They want to teach and encourage them. But, social norms won't let them until solicited. If a beginner has also the courage to communicate sincerely then they're likely to find both physiological and psychological support for their personal goals.
This is generally true for most things. Create the opportunity and almost everyone will teach and love as is practical for them.
I don't actually hate it. I love it because it's difficult thing to make, you had the courage to share it, and you asked me why.
I don't like how the accents have little contrast. And, the waves are irregular but don't seem to follow a natural edge. It doesn't "speak" to me in a way I can easily understand.
When we want to break hydrocarbon chains we use bases by default. But, I'd not use a base on a bike chain because if it rusts even a little bit it's junk.
For woodworking why is this better than mineral spirits?
They're thinking about demanding that billionaire-owned media outlets tell us what's going on.
Instead, I suggest we start buying more guns and killing more CEOs.