Most of the ones I've had that worked like that would lock up when you put the handle in the downwards position, so wind doesn't cause the window to move around when it's open.
Yeah, I'm rather confident that bots are rampant on here. All the wrong news sites are constantly the ones that are upvoted the most. The bots don't care who you hate, just that you hate. It doesn't matter if it is leaders, minorities, businesses, other nations, or whatever.
The bots agenda is to make it harder for people to work together in unison. Create disruptions and lower the operational efficiency of other nations.
I have personally advocated for doing this exact thing quite a few times over the past decade or so. It simply isn't fair that the US gets to tax people from all over the world when they print more money.
This is the mechanism and economic base structure of “democracy” in the west which prevents real progress and real change from happening to the structures and systems we have.
As a Dane I'm quite happy with the system and politicians we have here. What I see as the issue is when different untruthful and overly emotional media start getting a foothold, and the people don't punish politicians for lying. It is literally "Idiocracy" in the making.
LLM's aren't intelligent. "Intelligence" is the word that has to be cut. "Artificial" is accurate.
They cannot reason about things they haven't seen before, for instance. Ask it about "your new physics theory" and it will tell you that it is interesting and could revolutionize the world, basically regardless of how ridiculous and nonsensical it is.
That is because when new ideas do make it to the news and gets significant coverage, it is because it is an idea that has potential for actually being revolutionary. Since those ideas take up most of the space, it is a majority of what the LLM is trained on. That means that the basic response to any claimed physics idea is that it is great. Posts constantly show up on physics subreddits that prove this trend. These theories that show up never have math that makes sense, and make claims that doesn't correlate with the data we already have about our universe.
Jeg lagde mærke til at efter jeg havde opdateret Android i sidste uge, så havde den selv slået bluetooth til. Jeg bruger aldrig bluetooth, så jeg ved at det ikke er mig selv der har glemt at slå det fra.
Jeg opdagede det fordi jeg ville se hvorfor min strøm forsvandt hurtigere end det plejer, og ville se om jeg havde glemt at slå lokation fra.
That makes sense. In distortions for music instruments all of it is signal for instance. It's just that sometimes you don't want all of it because you want a specific sound to be produced.
I'm most used to working with digital electronics with a crystal supplying the frequency, so for me anything that is above that frequency is noise.
I totally agree. There are three small words that a lot of people need to use more often:
"I think that..."
Being able to distinguish between opinions and things that you can prove is right is important for debates. The goal is to reach the best conclusion, and you cannot do that if you base the conclusion on falsehoods.
Jeg har set videoerne allerede. Det jeg betvivler er bare om man kun kan tilføje flere af disse vektorer så der er flere kombinationer man kan lave, hvilket giver flere mulige outputs, eller om man også kan undgå at de forældede data bliver brugt. Det er jo ikke sådan at hver vektor gemmer hvert sit datapunkt, men i stedet er hvert datapunkt man har trænet på fordelt ud over alle vektorerne. Der er forskel på at tilføje nye informationer og at skulle fjerne gamle som er blandet sammen med alt det andet.
Det hjælper jo ikke hvis LLM'en kan komme frem til tekst fra både det gamle og det nye datablad når det gamle ikke er gyldigt længere.
Jeg har aldrig haft problemer med de slanger jeg har haft. Har adrig haft nogen i mere end 15 år, men det er også godt nok.