Getting them not from China and bolstering US influence in Australia. The former is a dud, for the explained reasons. The latter will suceed and keep Australia a loyal running dog.
The problem is not getting the rare earths. Those are common af. Refining is them is the problem, and China has essentially a global monopoly on it.
So the US can get all the rare earth it wants from Australia. It does not have the capabilities to refine the rew ressources tho, thus still having to rely on China.
Sure, the US could begin to create those capabilities. That would take around a decade...
Meanwhile, the window in which the US could feasibly wage war against China closes.
Cracking the enigma: Only influenced the war at sea in the atlantic. Did fuckall for the soviets.
Kursk: The soviets were the attackers, why would they need warning? "Careful, the nazis might shoot back."? No shit, Sherlock
Opening three different fronts: Years after the Soviets asked for it. Landings in europe only happened after the Soviets delivered heavy defeats to the Axis. Almost as if those landings were not intended to help but to keep the soviets from taking it all...
Invading Poland and muh massacres: 1. The so called invasion prevented a full occupation of Poland by Germany in 39. 2. Which massacres? Katyn? The one done with german ammo, in the middle of nowhere and conveniently found by the Wehrmacht??
Fighting on two fronts: The Soviets fought on three - Germany and allies to the west, Finland and allies to the north and Japan to the south-east (before kicking their teeth in so hard at Kalkhin Gol, they asked for a non-aggression pact).
Muh strategic bombing: Dind't actually cripple Germany, because target were civilians not industry.
Muh Lend-Lease: Still only a small fraction of what the Soviets produced, the trucks and radios were very usefull tho. 575 billion looks big in vacuum, but in a war on the scale of WW2? Its going grocery shopping once.
You sound like a Putinversteher!1111