That's technically true, but it's as misleading as saying they get their search results from Yandex. Their results are aggregated from several search engines, not just Bing. They also have their own web crawler, DuckDuckBot, which absolutely respects RobotRules.
Edit: I'm told my information is out of date. No more Yandex because of Uncle Sam. Yahoo is just Bing now, so that index doesn't count anymore. The bulk of the rest of their sources are largely inconsequential specialized search engines. Their sources page states that they "largely source from Bing".
Never seen that before today and now I've seen it twice. Was just thinking that 'opens new tab' was an odd name for one of the plaintiffs in the Anthropic lawsuit.
I don't see how this is pro Trump. It's an article about how Trump's DOJ did unethical things when prosecuting the people protesting Trump's inauguration.
If anything I need to rethink how I communicate that I'm not offended by people using social media, but I am offended by hypocrisy. I thought for sure that's what I typed out. I don't care that it came off as rude.
OP absolutely thought so. Their exact words were "Sorry my wanting to have the small amount of human contact I have outside my own family on a daily basis is so offensive to you.".
That's not even what I was implying. I don't care how much someone uses social media. I saw a comment on a social media platform about not using social media and couldn't help but roll my eyes. Then I clicked their profile and saw that they're averaging more than 100 comments a day for almost a year.
Was it flippant? Absolutely. Was it a gotcha moment? Maybe, but only in the sense that I was planning on pointing out the hypocrisy in implying they don't use social media on a social media platform, and instead found the exact kind of social media addict that the article describes
I read it on their sources page at some point, but it looks like that page has changed since last I looked.