When you run a game, the game is allowed to monitor your input (up to some configuration), so you shouldn't e.g. open a game and do online banking at the same time.
When the game installs a malicious software such that your input is monitored even when you're not running the game, then you can only rely on the additional defense mechanism. However, this is similar to all other software.
I had the same question. The author didn't seem to employ the scientific rigor to call things by their correct names. It's as if they're treating it like spelling in a meme.
Any two coils that are not directly connected. For example, suppose we number from the head, coil 1, 2, 3, 4. Then pairs that are not directly connected are: (1, 3), (1, 4), (2, 4). The endpoints of these pairs of segments cannot be connected by an edge of the cube.
It's the City of London (a small area within London), near the Bank Station. That area is designated as Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ). Cars other than the service kind (cabs, buses, lorries) would need to pay a high charge to go in. So effective no cars go in there usually.
It's more nuanced than that. I would characterize a significant portion of FLOSS philosophy and participants as "libertarianism" (in the US politics sense).
On LGBTQ issues, they seem to be compatible with "gay and communism", but a litmus test would be whether a member would support the use of FLOSS for
Large companies' profits (e.g. AWS)
Military suppliers (e.g. Palantir, Anduril)
Interpreting the licences in their literal text would mean that the above are not only allowed, but in fact part of the "liberty" the license aims to protect.
The tragedy is that lots of "gay and communism" participants will find themselves betrayed by the libertarian elements once an actual choice appears in reality, such as when people try to "patch" the movement with Code of Conduct.
The problem, in my opinion, roots in the tendencies of the founding members towards "tech neutrality". This is turn is a result of the US hippie movement's ideology of "no ideology".
I think rather d/dx is the operator. You apply it to an expression to bind free occurrences of x in that expression. For example, dx²/dx is best understood as d/dx (x²). The notation would be clear if you implement calculus in a program.
The BBC report cited mainly focused on the marketing industry, with the fixing mistake people being the copywriters. This gives a strong vibe of Madman, where you have the "old-fashioned" copywriters and the tension between market research.
There are two cases.
When you run a game, the game is allowed to monitor your input (up to some configuration), so you shouldn't e.g. open a game and do online banking at the same time.
When the game installs a malicious software such that your input is monitored even when you're not running the game, then you can only rely on the additional defense mechanism. However, this is similar to all other software.