Whan you say "follow the instructions", which instructions are you saying to follow?Instructions on the internet, instructions on stovetop popcorn, or instructions on microwave popcorn?
Why are you including codespaces in there???
That's a feature I wish more open-source projects made use of. Pristine working dev environments, on demand? Yes please
Surprise! The system of accumulating power was used to gain power to influence the government to let them gain more power to influence the government to let them gain more power to influence the government... Ad infinitum.
Government regulation of capitalism is fundamentally impossible in the long term, unless you lock it down early into something barely recognizable as capitalism. That ship has sailed long long ago.
You call it "socialism" because it's failing, but there isn't anything socialist about it; it's just late stage capitalism. Capitalism is a system of concentrating power, and this is what happens when you concentrate power.
It wasn't capitalism in the same way that "it wasn't real communism".
Sure, I guess maybe, but it's the inevitable outcome of the processes that define capitalism.
Just as all kittens become cats, this is what all capitalism becomes.
I'm actually thinking of the sociopolitical ramifications of both scenarios here.
I feel like if physical attraction between species was common, then we'd end up with crazy purity culture, no matter if they could procreate or not; because members of a species would see a sharp decline in the population of their species in the younger generations, as most couples were either unable to produce offspring, or produced offspring of a new species.
I'm curious what an animal that was like 1/16th 16 random animals would look like. With so much selection, would everyone tend to the average of all animals after like 10 generations? Would we end up with a single blended specie? Would it reduce into a handful of different blends that achieved critical mass?
Sort of.
I was trying to highlight the clear inevitable outcome, rather than highlight who to blame.