Contrary to everyone here I would encourage you to go further. Understanding dialectics is a necessity for any Marxist--here you will perhaps be interested in Lenin's Philosophical Notebooks. To really understand dialectics, and be able to make the transformation to its material ground would put you in a position to understand Marxism better than 99% of today's "Marxists"
A few old Bolsheviks wrote biographies that will give you clear, concrete details of underground activity. See "Twenty Years in Underground Russia: Memoirs of a Rank-and-File Bolshevik" by Cecilia Bobrovskaya
And yet Marx & Engels championed internationalism from the very start. To pay lip service to Marxism while excizing its most basic principals is a serious error of opportunism.
On the one hand its cool, good, rest in piss, etc. On the other hand I just can't help but think: Really? Charlie Kirk? In 2025? Could you not have thought of a better target? We know the heritage foundation or whatever practically clones these guys in their basement, so it just seems extra pointless. Probably will be forgotten in a few months.
Postmodern nonsense. Playing games with language and symbols, inventing categories--alterity, difference, whathaveyou, has no explanitory power in comparison to class, their movements and relations. What this blog post boils down to is nothing new: a slavish devotion to spontaneity, and indivualistic terror. It is no longer 1840. We have roughly 200 years of accumulated revolutionary experience all around us. That is our starting point. That is what we must take up and synthesize if we are to begin again, and pull this world out of the dark age its been cast into. Forgot Derrida.
Class, not caste. And what you're describing is the condition of the proletariat as a whole: the limit of spontaneous consciousness is trade union consciousness (see Lenin's What Is To Be Done)