Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
114
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Cool! Do Trump next, cause that was fast.

  • Yes, but people not paying attention won't and thus will assume that Trump finally did something good for manufacturing.

  • Super quick rains wash away very quickly. Not enough time to soak into the soil so they don't lessen a drought very much. Need snow accumulating in high country, too, which isn't happening.

  • Ah, so you are Russian. If you were Ukrainian and wanted your family to stop dying, then you wouldn't be pro Trump.

  • Christ, you REALLY like gobblin' Putin's dick, don't you?

  • Cheeky

    Jump
  • Cheeky

    Jump
  • I'm glad you think your god is incompetent.

  • You can get your absentee ballot mailed to a different address, such as a family members house that wasn't destroyed.

  • Standups are a short (hopefully) meeting usually done in a software development environment that tells the team what everyone was and is working on amd what issues are blocking them (i.e., blockers)

  • I expect they had some or mostly legitimate clients. Really hard to hide a drug distribution network in the open without legitimate traffic to hide in.

  • Purebred mutt. 100% good boy.

  • I mean, they DO site their sources. It's in the description.

    Satan has amassed an impressive list of biblical scholars ready to reveal the "standard stuff" taught in Christian seminaries: Bart Ehrman (UNC Chapel Hill), John J. Collins (Yale), Dale Allison (Princeton Seminary), Susan Niditch (Amherst), Ron Hendel (UC Berkeley), and Hector Avalos (Iowa State). This is established seminary curriculum about biblical history, biblical morals, authorship claims, and early Christianity — a curriculum never shared with the congregation.

    They even show clips of those experts reading from well-cited books like Fighting Words: The Origins of Religious Violence or The Apocalyptic Imagination. You can go read those or others of multi-hundred page books shown if you want the definitive evidence, but in this case this wasn't about "here's the hard evidence". Especially since people don't change their minds if you present evidence like that.

    It's supposed to consolidate information and help people start the process to questioning some things that maybe were once set in stone. Not fully change change minds or be referenced as a resource.

  • Care to elaborate on how? or what could have been done differently? For a free video on the internet, I'd say it's pretty good.