Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N
Posts
29
Comments
228
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • So, there are some misconceptions about this on both sides. While some may misunderstand how tax brackets work, there absolutely are certain income thresholds where barely going over a certain amount will net you less money overall.


    Edit: To clarify, you should accept the raise. In most cases all you need to do to avoid "losing money" at any of these points is to lower your AGI by contributing to an IRA, 401K, etc.


    For example (using 2025 numbers here for a single filer):



    • Medicare Premium Increase (for those on medicare) @ $106k your medicare tax increases by $888, so you don't want a raise that puts you between $106k and $~107k @ $133k medicare tax increases by $1.3k, so you don't want a raise between $133k and $134k @ $167k medicare tax increases by $1.3k again @ $200k medicare tax increases by $1.3k again @ $500k medicare tax increases by $444... https://www.nerdwallet.com/article/insurance/medicare/what-is-the-medicare-irmaa



    There are probably a few other taxes/credits I didn't include, but this is just a quick example with what I could look up at the moment.

  • I've never looked into Blockchain Capital much before, some quick search results show that they have invested in BlueSky (not enough to own/run the company from what I could find), but I don't see anything that associates them with nazis.

    How are you defining nazis here? What leads you to believe that Blockchain Capital is a nazi company? What links are there from Steve Banon to Blockchain Capital?

  • Do you just call the owners of any company a Nazi? How are you defining Nazis here?Judging by your upvotes I must be out of the loop on something here.

    I tried to look into this claim and all I found was a CEO that's also a software dev Jay Graber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jay_Graber (Nothing controversial that I could find in her posts at a cursory glance)

    A software dev that worked on XMPP (Jeremy Miller): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremie_Miller

    And the CEO and founder of TechDirt (Mike Masnick): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mike_Masnick

  • Thanks! It doesn't work through a regular web browser or with Voyager.

    Looks like it does work with Eternity as well though.

  • Was that supposed to be a spoiler tag? What client does that work with?

  • Agreed, this is what the Forward Party is trying to do. They want to help people get elected at all levels that will support and help make changes so that we're not stuck in some 2-party system.

    Although, I think that approval voting or STAR voting is better than ranked-choice voting.

  • What do you mean by "allow you to kill a 3rd party"?

    Like if rioters are breaking into your window and start trying to pull you out through it, then you floor it and kill someone else in the crowd who wasn't actively breaking into your car?

    This is something that's going to vary from state to state, but ultimately it will be a case by case decision where a jury will decide if the use of deadly force was reasonable.

    You will be judged based on other's perception of the events, not based solely whether you yourself thought you were in danger or not.

    So, someone trying to "drive slowly" through a group of protesters would probably be found at fault, while a car that was stuck trying to wait patiently suddenly having a Molotov cocktail thrown on it would be judged differently. Even then they will need to consider whether you could have just gotten out of your car and run.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-drivers-dont-have-the-right-to-plow-through-protesters-idUSKBN23B39F/

  • It really bothers me when journalists don't list out which laws specifically were passed/signed.

    Even better if they could link to the bill text itself, yet instead they just link to a similar article on their own site.

  • Nah, Cygnus beat you by about 14 min.

    (On a serious note, had you already heard about someone else being convicted under the new security law? It also sounds like they're talking about how the sentence was increased from 2 years to 7-10 years.)

  • I'm confused.

    What prominent figures on the left have said something to the effect of "If we lose, the election was rigged!"??

    I can only think of prominent figures on the right who have made statements like this.

    Or are you saying that those who are against the 2 party system typically fall under the thinking that the election is rigged?

  • Same as it ever was.

    I doubt this was the case during (and for at least a time after) WWII. But maybe a history buff can correct me. I haven't looked too deeply into how the justice system handled Nazis that far back.

  • Woah, I wish I had known about this sooner. Thanks!

  • Then if they go this route, they better make sure that they clearly define what they mean by a "Recommendation Algorithm" or an "interests-based algorithm" because the opinions of individuals won't hold up in court.

    If it's not defined an attorney could easily argue that Lemmy's "Scaled" algorithm is a "recommendation algorithm" and you would hope that the judge understood enough about programming to know where to draw the line.

  • Spiritual.Hero who appears in you to clear your view when you're too crazy.