Yeah that's exactly what Windows is like. Things normally work fine but when something goes wrong it can be a real pain and often simpler just to reinstall as Windows doesn't always give you good tools to fix it. When something goes wrong on a Linux system there is pretty much always some way of fixing it because it's an open book with good tooling for diagnostics and repair. The problem is things tend to go wrong more often or be more clunky to use in the first instance.
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 170
- Joined
- 8 mo. ago
- Posts
- 1
- Comments
- 170
- Joined
- 8 mo. ago
The problem they are talking about is specific to Linux Mint, not to Linux in general. Linux Mint is known for not working on newer hardware because of its outdated kernel. Ironically arch based distros would work well here as they always have a new kernel.
Okay modern China I get, but the USSR? You don't think the USSR were a socialist republic at any point? What kind of communist even are you?
You argue the Culture are communist but the compact isn't based on a monopoly of violence yet I am sure if you tried to use violence that the Minds didn't agree with they would have you stopped in short order. Don't they have something called a slap drone in the culture for people who do things that are unpopular? Since they don't have laws it's not like you get a court trial even. I would argue it's worse than the Affini which at least pretends to have procedures and rules. Minds can basically do whatever they want provided the other Minds approve.
It depends. Lack of air circulation can cause problems in minutes as people can end up breathing stagnant air. Less of a problem if you have artificial gravity as then you have convection and/or the coriolis effect to help keep the air moving. As for actually running out: less of an issue.
- JumpRemoved Deleted Locked
Permanently Deleted
I am not a furry lol
- JumpRemoved Deleted Locked
Permanently Deleted
Furies don't do it with animals you dense motherfucker
Yes they are an imperialist empire. I never said otherwise. What I was saying is they are not fascist nor are they capitalist. They aren't necessarily feudalist either.
As for political rights: you have as much political freedom as you do in current "democracies". Which is to say as an individual you can't change much at all. Take the USA for example, individuals don't choose the laws they live under, states can make some laws but are limited in their power and self-governence. If a state tried to leave they probably wouldn't be allowed to and it would probably lead to civil war and them being recaptured. That's basically what the Terran Protectorate is in the Affini compact. It's a state in the larger compact with limited self-governance. Terrans can vote in larger elections in the larger Affini compact much like they can vote for things in the Terran protectorate. Arguably they are more free under the compact than they were in the Terran accord or current day society as the Affini compact does not have rich oligarchs who control everything. Means of production are owned by both Affini and independents.
Forcing other states to become their vassels is definitely an imperialist thing to do, but in this case it doesn't really remove the rights of the individuals only the rights of governments. I think that's an important thing to understand.
I would argue that the possibility of forced Domestication as well as all the psychic manipulation is the real serious issue with the compact in terms of freedom. The privileges afforded to only Affini such as the ability to take florets are another serious issue. You could very well call those things abuse. In terms of government and economics they are pretty free by comparison.
Is there much culture fan fiction? Now I am intrigued.
Independent xenosophonts do have political rights and means of production are collectively owned and managed. It's only florets that don't have political rights. In some cases florets have say over means of production as well, at least the ones that actually do any production as many don't work at all. Affini can also be florets. Again I don't think you have actually read that much HDG. You could argue that florets are an underclass. However most florets are also volunteers and have some very explicit rights in the story. In fact Affini are bound by those rights to look after florets more than they look after independents or each other. I really don't think you can compare the Affini to Israel who are doing a genocide given the Affini avoid killing at all costs and respect local languages and even traditions provided they aren't harmful.
Yes the Affini compact would not at all work in real life and anyone who tried it would end up committing some form of abuse. I am not trying to argue it's realism here. You are however completely and seemingly deliberately ignoring what it actually is and how it's described by the various authors.
They literally do not have money in the compact. The work in the compact is done by the same people who control and own the means of production. Namely the Affini do most of the work and the Affini own most of the production. There are some xenosophonts who produce, and they control that production in some cases. I am not sure you have actually read much HDG at all.
I guess that makes sense. Although you should know that canonically being a floret is not the same as being a slave.
There are stories in HDG written from an Affini perspective. There are stories of very imperfect Affini as well, including those who get forcibly domesticated for their own good or to prevent harm to others. In real life the politics of the Affini compact probably wouldn't hold up, but given these things are genetically engineered aliens with different drives to humans it's hard to really know.
That can't be right. I know there some are HDG stories that deal with politics. No Gods No Masters would be an example, though they deal more with human politics than Affini politics. Maybe Sui Generis or Affini Domestication Guide? The latter being one of the few that deals directly with Affini getting domesticated.
Are you sure? They definitely could be seen as an empire, but I don't know about fascist. They economically speaking have communism in the compact. In fact they appropriate all the billionaires toys and redistribute as needed.
People I think are forgetting that slavery and fascism aren't the same thing. Not even close. It's also not the case that this is traditional slavery, they don't take florets for economic reasons and most are volunteers.
The darknet? You can get anything on the darknet
I never said those were the only countries. You are trying to justify bad practices and nonsense arguments by screaming xenophobia where there is no xenophobia.
You are really reaching here. I live in the UK but I am pretty sure the EU have regulations just as harsh and certainly harsher than the USA. Where I am in academia we have machines that are 6-8 years old that we are only allowed to use in development and testing environments. They can't be used in production because our IT team won't allow it.
There is no good reason to put Windows XP on an internet connected network in a production environment. It's acceptable only on air gapped machines. If you have servers that are too new for modern Windows then use Linux. Failing that buy a new machine.
Yes I am well aware that modern mainframes exist, I am actually planning to get certified on them at some point. They are however a very niche solution, which you clearly should know, and often tasked to run software made decades ago. A mainframe from 1999 is not exactly modern.
If you legit are running Windows XP or Server 2003 then you are way out of government regulations and compliance and your whole team should be sacked immediately including you. Don't come on a public forum and brag about the incompetence of your whole organisation for fuck's sake. You just painted a target on your back. You clearly have no understanding of either cyber security or operational security doing things like that.
Talking about a single mainframe lasting 20+ years is disingenuous given mainframes are not normal servers and inherently have a longer lifespan. Even then 20+ years is an exceptionally long operation for one of these, not because of hardware limitations, but because it normally does not make financial sense. Mainframes typically run legacy systems so they are the one place these kinds of financial rules don't apply.
The average operational lifespan of a server is still 5-6 years as it's always been. Some businesses are replaced every 3 years. A quick Google search would tell you that. That's not a limit inherent to the hardware, but simply how long they are warranted and deployed for in most instances. As I explained before it doesn't make sense to keep servers around for that long when more modern options are available. Saying they "would still work perfectly fine" doesn't really mean anything outside of the hobbyist and used server market.
LLMs haven't reached a pause in performance and they are only a category of AI models. If you actually kept track of advancements instead of sitting here whining about it you would have seen more has been happening in even just the last year then just throwing data and compute at the problem. I find your intentional ignorance to be morally insulting.
Ytou're issue is probably that you are using Mint. They have serious issues with out of date drivers.