You can reject and subscribe, then instantly click back and the message goes away. I assume legally that should count as a rejection but i wouldn’t put it past them to say “by reading without subscribing you consent to cookies”
Let met put it like this; if you were to put my comment on “mildlyinfuriating” right now because you disagree with me, i would be fine with that. You have every right to be infuriated with me, and if my username was on that post, that would not be grounds for removing your post. That is because at the end of the day you have every right to voice your mild annoyance with me, and that annoyance does not constitute harassment. People disagree, that is life, if you think someone disagreeing with how someone conducts themselves online is an insult that is on you. If all criticism is invalid to you that is on you. But criticism is not slander, it is acceptable commentary, grow the fuck up
No it’s “ why is someone purposefully making their comments harder to understand, i find that annoying” which is valid. Their post made no insult to the person themselves and no call to action against them. All they did was imply it is mildly infuriating based on the community they posted in, which i am inclined to agree with
I had the same thought so did a little due diligence. Photo manipulation detector found nothing and reverse image search found the image attributed to the American Photo Archive on Alamy so it seems to be legit as far as initial checks can tell
This account if fully independently operated btw Rainbolt talked about it on stream years ago. He just lets them because its promotion for him