Skip Navigation

Posts
0
Comments
171
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Because it's their job? They can't just watch what they like.

  • I'm always shocked by the absurdity of it all. For any other job on Earth, these people would be 10 years overdue retirement.

  • That's the origin story of The Matrix. Only, we don't have real AI but glorified chatbots.

  • Can we go back to jokes about Mafia? I'd rather prefer that.

  • Up to not too long ago, the granddaughter of Mussolini was in the same political party.

  • Maybe to justify the billions of budget they have been allocated.

  • They presented to you a reasonable use case (assisted learning) and your response was "lol, you're just lazy. Do it on your own. I did it, so can you".

    I am in a similar position, networking is Martian to me and if I search guides on how to do stuff, it's full of people that go "just use X to do a reverse proxy", as if I have 200h of experience under my belt. I'd rather have a chatbot explain to me like I am 5 in some cases.

  • Because the last time someone introduced an invasive species to a completely different environment worked extremely well.

  • Have you tried with catnip?

  • Yes

    Jump
  • That's not how correlation works.

  • Re-defining "stripping the walls for copper" in the current year.

  • Maybe because students are using it anyways, so it's better to teach how to use it responsibly, check for sources and not to trust blindly anything it outputs. But I am being optimistic.

  • Yes

    Jump
  • My gut tells me "it was revealed to them in a dream"

  • Yes, but all was deleted were the ChatGPT chats. Is that all the research produced in 2 years? Probably nothing of value was lost.

  • Make a copy of the database, randomize and send useless data?

  • Normally if there are postive effects from a drug, they get studied further and re-marketed as such. If I remember correctly, Viagra was originally a medicine for heart conditions.

  • So that they get so deep into recession that they cannot lie their way out of it? But you make a valid counterpoint.

  • No, no, that's the point. You should sell them even more (at a higher price).