Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)N

Neon 🏳️‍🌈🇺🇦🇪🇺🏳️‍⚧️🇹🇼🇮🇱🏳️‍🌈

@ Neon @lemmy.world

Posts
1
Comments
636
Joined
2 yr. ago

Swiss Pan-European Nationalist

  • name checks out (the [they/she] part)

  • No, for multiple reasons:

    1. they're cooperating with the palestinian authority, the official recognized palestinian leader. So it's more like fighting against ISIS on iraqs territory.
    2. Hamas was the first to attack. So this is an "invasion" the same way the soviet union or britain "invaded" nazi germany
  • I fucking hate monolithic kernels

    Yes please, I want to recompile the entire kernel for every different embedded hardware.

    Yes please, I want drivers in the hardware that probably aren't checked for malware.

    But it's the only functional FOSS Desktop-OS, so I continue using it.

    Maybe RedoxOS someday. One can dream.

  • Not wanting uyghurs to be genocided because of their religion = cringy bullcrap?

    Really?

    Just block and move on instead of trying to sway oppinions with fake-accounts.

    Or better yet: you can support defederation. Then you won't see any of our anti-genocide posts ever again!

  • Oh great, now we have genocide-deniers here.

    That right here is why we should defederate.

    Also curious how all the comments replying to me are less than one day old 🤔🤔

    Could it be an astroturfing campaign by lemmy.ml users? 🤔🤔🤔

  • Freshly created account, less than a day old.

    Totally couldn't be an astroturfing acoount, could it??

    But to answer you question:

    If they are allowed their own instance with genocide, why shouldn't we be allowed one without genocide?

  • I've been banned from the entire .ml instnce and all its communities for daring to talk about the uyghur genocide.

    Yes, we need to defederate now.

  • Not really either. While greenland and the others are highly autonomous and practically their own countries, national security is not in their competence but instead the job of the kingdom. Not like NATO where every country has their own military and has to help each other but as a federation where there is only one military.

    Niels Anderson does a way better Job than me explaining it:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlK3f1cs_l4

  • No, tht's not it either.

    Think of the kingdom of denmark as kind of a Mini-EU consisting of Denmark, the Faroe Islands and Greenland.

  • They do stand in a relation to each other, but they're not the same thing.

    As I said, Denmark (country) is in the kingdom of denmark, so they have something to do with each ither.

  • claims

    Greenland is a sovereign country in the kingdom of denmark, nothing that needs to be claimed.

    The same way denmark is a sovereign country in the kingdom of denmark

    Denmark (country) ≠ Denmark (Kingdom)

  • Late microplastic era?

  • Nur ein Problem:

    Das schweizer Gesundheitssystem ist nicht am kollabieren. Dem geht es sogar eher recht gut.

  • Greenland is its own country, this is like saying denmark should sell mexico to the US.

    They can't, it's not their land.

  • Except they have.

    They have the constitutional roght to unilaterally declare independence and they are mostly autonomous except for a few topics (like national security)

  • Or just reinstate slavery

  • Socialism is scary and way worse than capitalism in many ways

    What you're thinking of is social democracy.

    minimum wage, universal healthcare, all the nice stuff here in Europe is social-democratic, not socialist

  • Tht one dev is the only dev. They're dead.