I've seen a musical called Rent. It's about people in New York who are homeless/stuck in poverty around when HIV was at its peak. Honestly I don't know much about it, I mostly saw it because a friend of mine was performing, but it's definitely not a typical upper middle class perspective.
If Pepycito is right, they might be employed as police officers, but they're not currently working as officers. I'm no expert on US law, so I don't know if that actually counts as impersonation, but knowing the US it proposal doesn't matter since it wouldn't be enforced anyway.
My personal rule is "do I know why that word is a swear word, and is that a dumb reason?"
That means Anglo-Saxon words like fuck or shit are fine. They're swear words because of William the conqueror invading England, and making all the nobility speak Norman. Then all the peasants started to use some French words to sound more posh, so the Anglo-Saxon words became 'less pleasant' than the Norman words, and that meant shit, fuck, and similar words just got kicked out.
On the other hand, there are swear words I won't use. Anything with a terrible historical use, an actually bad definition, or any religious connotation (yes, I'm religious, but I'd still keep this if I wasn't). Example, I won't use the word damn as a swear word, since I would never wasn't someone to be sent to hell. No, I don't believe that saying "damn you" will actually damn someone, but I just think it's a swear word for a good reason.
I would honestly love to see something like Paul's letters, but addressed to the modern American church. Paul didn't mess around when the churches were acting up.
I think, when done right, games are the best medium for storytelling.
they can do the job of both movies and books. Games like dark souls use more vague descriptions to spark imagination beyond what's onscreen
they have a tactile feedback that no other medium has. Example being God of War (2018). When atreus is on his dickhead arc, he actually stops responding to player input, so the player really feels the change in his character.
The only downsides are that they're harder to make than other mediums, and can be much less accessible.
That kea description is wrong. They are not an anti hero, they're just a menace. Imagine the destruction of a genius toddler with wings and a knife. That's basically a kea.
How many people actually want to support this vs just joking about it "to own the libs".
Not excusing either option. The joking option is just as bad as long as it looks like actual support. I just wanting to know how much of that support is genuine.
The issue isn't whether or not their documented or felons, it's that they didn't have a trial so they didn't have a chance to prove either way