Yeah, we get that. The thing is, there’s no rule that says how you should sit on a train, that’d be ridiculous (ofc you shouldn’t invade other seats or put your feet on them).
The article explains that an entitled white woman told a black man that she didn’t like the way he was sitting, and because the white is always right in America, that poor man got pulled out from the train and arrested: no questions asked whatsoever.
Imagine that someone tells you “I don’t like the way you word your comments” and then you get reported and banned for that without way to defend yourself; it’s the same here except that this involves racism.
I have some experience disassembling laptops and such but never a phone or a tablet. I asked because I didn’t want to get it unusable when it still works.
I’d love to buy a new one, but for what I use it for, I feel like it’s not worth at all, I’ve been thinking that this might be my last iPad.
That's a weak argument without substance. "No, you!" is not exactly a good counter.
Wdym? Can you elaborate on that? That’s literally your own argument, you just said And you'd argue wrong here, that is simply not the definition of intelligence., then you didn’t explain why nor give a definition that matches your vision of artificial intelligence, you’re just saying someone is wrong without founding your reasoning.
Yes, that's exactly what I'm talking about, which refutes your argument in 1).
Again, how that refutes my own argument? Care to elaborate?
That's a whole different discussion. That intelligence is required to build something has nothing to do with whether the product is intelligent.
Yes, it is, but you kept using it to “prove” your point.
The fact that you manage to mangle that up so bad is almost worrying.
Can you point out what is and why’s bad or worrying? Like I think we’re not in the same page
Like, are you seriously saying that everyone in Wikipedia is wrong but you? You’re the only one delusional here.
Believe or not, a bunch of if statements can mimic intelligent behavior, again, not like it’s intelligent, it looks like which is the whole point (that you obviously missed out)
How can you tell someone is wrong when you have no idea?
I think you missed the point, I said artificial intelligence, not intelligence as a whole.
Yes, playing an instrument in a way that makes sense requires certain degree of intelligence, the music box inherently is not intelligent, but intelligence was required to build it.
Yeah, we get that. The thing is, there’s no rule that says how you should sit on a train, that’d be ridiculous (ofc you shouldn’t invade other seats or put your feet on them).
The article explains that an entitled white woman told a black man that she didn’t like the way he was sitting, and because the white is always right in America, that poor man got pulled out from the train and arrested: no questions asked whatsoever.
Imagine that someone tells you “I don’t like the way you word your comments” and then you get reported and banned for that without way to defend yourself; it’s the same here except that this involves racism.